IBJNews

Bosma to return $10,000 Durham donation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Speaker of the House Brian Bosma agreed on Friday to return to Fair Finance Co. the $10,000 contribution he received from the company’s indicted CEO, Tim Durham, according to the company’s bankruptcy trustee.

The development came two days after Trustee Brian Bash sued Bosma’s campaign committee and four other GOP campaign committees seeking to recover $138,580 in political donations that accused Ponzi schemer Tim Durham made since 2006.

“We are thankful he did the right thing,” said David Proano, an attorney for Bash, said of Bosma.

The other four suits remain pending. Bash is seeking the largest sum—$50,000—from the Greater Indianapolis Republican Finance Committee. In all the cases, Bash argues that Fair is entitled to recover the money because at the time Durham made the donations he owed millions of dollars to Fair and its parent companies. By the end of 2005, at the latest, Fair operated as a Ponzi scheme and was insolvent by more than $50 million, according to the lawsuits.

“Durham made the payment to defendant with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud Fair Finance and its parent companies,” according to the suits.

The other suits seek $40,000 from the committee for Lawrence Mayor Paul Ricketts, $33,580 from the House Republican Campaign Committee and $5,000 from the Marion County Republican Central Committee.

Before his financial empire collapsed in 2009, Durham was a huge funder of Republican political candidates. The trustee hasn’t filed suits against the biggest recipients of Durham’s political largesse—campaign committees associated with Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi. Both candidates received about $200,000 from Durham.

In an e-mail Friday afternoon, Brizzi suggested a settlement was in the offing. "We are working with the trustee toward a mutually agreeable resolution," he said.

Proano added: “We are in good faith discussions and making progress toward a settlement.”

He would not discuss Daniels. In a written statement last month, Bash said Daniels at least had responded to the trustee’s request that he return campaign contributions, unlike most others, and the trustee hoped “for mutual resolution through continued discussions.”

A spokeswoman for Daniels did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

Paul Okeson, treasurer for the Greater Indianapolis Republican Finance Committee, said: “We are in receipt of notice of the suit. We will consider all options. We intend to be cooperative in those discussions to figure out the best outcome.”

For more than a year, Bash has been trying to recover money for Fair investors—Ohio residents who purchased unsecured investment certificates with interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. He alleges Durham “utterly looted” Fair after buying it in 2002, stripping the business of the financial wherewithal to repay more than 5,000 investors who are owed more than $200 million.

In the statement, he praised Indiana Sen. Mike Delph for recently returning $10,000 and implored fellow elected officials to follow suit.

Last month, Marion County Republican Party Chairman Kyle Walker expressed sympathy for victims of Fair Finance’s collapse but said Durham’s contributions to the party have “long since been spent in good faith.”

Most of Durham's political contributions went to Republicans, but former Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson collected $2,000, and former U.S. Rep. Baron Hill received $5,000. Adam Kisch, spokesman for the Marion County Democratic Party, said he did not know whether the men, both Democrats, had returned the contributions.

Durham and two business partners, James Cochran and Rick Snow, were arrested March 16 after being indicted on 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Money
    Hey, I just remembered. Tim walked around town claiming for years that his personal wealth was 75 to 100 million dollars. I see he only personally owes around 40 million. Shouldn't be any problem to pay it back because allegedly he'd still have 35-60 million leftover! Tim is no liar, he'll just give the money back he owes, he's good for it! HA. What a circus, can't wait to see who the FBI arrests next!
  • re
    wrongo....there weren't loans, those were purported loans that appear to be backdated on the eve of the FBI raid...HELLO....if those "loans" were real then explain why Durham mortgaged all those assets post receipt of Fair money without mentioning to the banks and mortgage companies where the funds came from?

    But, your comment is exactly what defense he plans to use...the problem you have is you don't understand you cannot help yourself to client monies, violate Ohio state laws which require truthful disclosure and by the way take a single dollar over state lines without violating the intrastate exemption.

    Timmy is going to prison. And all of his mooch friends deserve to be as well.
  • This whole thing is over blown
    Tim Durham and his 2 partners are basically guilty of borrowing more than they could afford...kinda like a lot of Americans who put to much on credits cards and get bigger houses than they could afford. Durham is guilty of mismanagement and skating the moral line and this whole thing really needs to be a civil issue..not an issue of him facing the rest of his life in an ohio state prison!
    • Typical
      Mitch Daniels shows his true colors...

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

    ADVERTISEMENT