IBJNews

Vegetable growers, Dow settle dispute over new herbicide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A coalition of vegetable growers and food producers led by Indiana-based Red Gold Inc. will drop their opposition to a new herbicide developed by Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences LLC, the two sides announced Tuesday.

The Save Our Crops Coalition said in the statement that it would “amend” its previous requests that U.S. regulators conduct an environment review and convene a panel of outside advisers before approving Dow’s Enlist Weed Control System.

The coalition made those demands in April before the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Their concern was that Dow’s Enlist system uses an old herbicide called 2,4-D, which has a history of drifting from fields of corn and soybeans onto vegetables, grapes and trees, and killing them. In response, Dow officials insisted they had reformulated 2,4-D to cut down such drifting by 90 percent.

Since the coalition raised an alarm, the two sides spent time discussing Dow’s published research on how much its reformulation of 2,4-D limits drifting. Also, Dow has developed more detailed plans for educating farmers on “best practices” for applying 2,4-D near sensitive crops and reaffirmed its commitment to investigate cases of damage caused by drifting of the herbicide.

Dow also promised to include additional commitments to such programs in its labeling for the Enlist product.

The coalition “believes that commitments made by Dow AgroSciences represent substantial measures to mitigate potential non-target plant damage impacts from herbicide spray drift and volatilization associated with 2,4-D tolerant crops,” Tuesday’s joint press statement said.

Dow has yet to win approval for its Enlist system, which also includes genetically modified seeds for soybeans that tolerate the 2,4-D herbicide. The Enlist product is intended to help farmers whose fields have developed weeds that are resistant to the leading herbicide, Round-Up, made by St. Louis-based Monsanto Co.

Dow expects its Enlist system, including 2,4-D and related seeds, will generate more than $1 billion in earnings over the product's life cycle. Dow also plans to launch genetically modified seeds for corn and cotton as part of the Enlist system.

Monsanto is also developing a new system of soybean seeds that tolerant the herbicide dicamba. The Save Our Crops Coalition has also objected to that new product for similar reasons that it opposed Dow’s Enlist system.

"We have appreciated Dow’s commitment to prevent off-target injury," wrote Steve Smith, director of agriculture at tomato company Red Gold, who has been serving as chairman of the coalition, in an e-mail. "The situation with dicamba has not changed at all and remains a major concern for not only the specialty crop industry but for rural homeowners and gardeners."

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT