IBJNews

Vegetable growers, Dow settle dispute over new herbicide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A coalition of vegetable growers and food producers led by Indiana-based Red Gold Inc. will drop their opposition to a new herbicide developed by Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences LLC, the two sides announced Tuesday.

The Save Our Crops Coalition said in the statement that it would “amend” its previous requests that U.S. regulators conduct an environment review and convene a panel of outside advisers before approving Dow’s Enlist Weed Control System.

The coalition made those demands in April before the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Their concern was that Dow’s Enlist system uses an old herbicide called 2,4-D, which has a history of drifting from fields of corn and soybeans onto vegetables, grapes and trees, and killing them. In response, Dow officials insisted they had reformulated 2,4-D to cut down such drifting by 90 percent.

Since the coalition raised an alarm, the two sides spent time discussing Dow’s published research on how much its reformulation of 2,4-D limits drifting. Also, Dow has developed more detailed plans for educating farmers on “best practices” for applying 2,4-D near sensitive crops and reaffirmed its commitment to investigate cases of damage caused by drifting of the herbicide.

Dow also promised to include additional commitments to such programs in its labeling for the Enlist product.

The coalition “believes that commitments made by Dow AgroSciences represent substantial measures to mitigate potential non-target plant damage impacts from herbicide spray drift and volatilization associated with 2,4-D tolerant crops,” Tuesday’s joint press statement said.

Dow has yet to win approval for its Enlist system, which also includes genetically modified seeds for soybeans that tolerate the 2,4-D herbicide. The Enlist product is intended to help farmers whose fields have developed weeds that are resistant to the leading herbicide, Round-Up, made by St. Louis-based Monsanto Co.

Dow expects its Enlist system, including 2,4-D and related seeds, will generate more than $1 billion in earnings over the product's life cycle. Dow also plans to launch genetically modified seeds for corn and cotton as part of the Enlist system.

Monsanto is also developing a new system of soybean seeds that tolerant the herbicide dicamba. The Save Our Crops Coalition has also objected to that new product for similar reasons that it opposed Dow’s Enlist system.

"We have appreciated Dow’s commitment to prevent off-target injury," wrote Steve Smith, director of agriculture at tomato company Red Gold, who has been serving as chairman of the coalition, in an e-mail. "The situation with dicamba has not changed at all and remains a major concern for not only the specialty crop industry but for rural homeowners and gardeners."

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT