IBJNews

Veolia losing water contract, will get $29M termination fee

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Veolia will no longer have a role in operating Indianapolis Water after the city sells the utility to Citizens Energy Group—but the company will walk away with $29 million in the form of a contract-termination fee.

Meanwhile, Citizens plans to make job offers to “substantially all” of Veolia’s 436 employees at the water utility.

The contract-termination agreement announced Thursday, which must be approved by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, came as somewhat of surprise. Citizens has been in talks with water system operator Veolia since at least July, when City-County Council members approved the sale.

In the end, however, it became clear that a narrower role for Veolia under Citizens’ ownership would not offer much in the way of profit potential, said Brian Clarke, executive vice president for Veolia North America. The French company operates water and wastewater utilities in more than 650 cities including Atlanta and Buffalo.

Citizens is a public charitable trust that provides natural gas, chilled water and steam service in the Indianapolis area.  The savings from consolidating the back offices of several utilities as well as supply chain efficiencies gives Citizens an edge in costs, and it expects $60 million in annual savings after a three-year integration period.

 “It’s a little tough to argue with the city’s choice here, given the very unique position Citizens holds,” Clarke said. “We’re very proud of what we’ve done” managing Indianapolis Water.

Veolia has managed the city water utility since 2002 under a contract that was to have expired in 2022. Mayor Greg Ballard proposed selling the water and sewer operations as a way to generate cash for city infrastructure improvements.

City officials Thursday said the $29 million termination fee is consistent with the original operating contract and “reimburses Veolia for investments it made to improve the [water] system at the company’s cost,” which had originally anticipated a 20-year rate of return.

“Utility rates won’t go up as a result of this payment,” said Chris Cotterill, chief of staff for Mayor Greg Ballard. That’s because the fee will come from a $40 million escrow account, funded by the sanitary district general fund, set up last summer to cover unanticipated costs in selling the city’s water and sewer operations to Citizens.

The contract termination fee does, however, put a big dent in potential bonus the city could have reaped from the utility sales.

If the $40 million would have remained in the escrow after two years, the city would have been able to keep $25 million of it—raising its take from the sale to $459.7 million versus $434.7 million.

Citizens also would have benefitted, keeping $15 million had the transition been achieved without tapping the $40 million escrow.

Citizens’ President and CEO, Carey Lykins, asked how Citizens could forgo help from Veolia with Citizens having never before operated a water utility, said Citizens expects to retain the bulk of the experienced Veolia personnel who already run the utility. Lykins also said there are similarities  between running a water utility and Citizens existing gas, steam and chilled water units. “You might be surprised how much commonality there is,” he said.

Citizens needs “the fine experienced men and women now providing water and wastewater service to the Indianapolis community,” states an update document on the deal provided by the city and Citizens.

All of the current bargaining-unit employees at the water system will have jobs with Citizens. Meanwhile, all union employees of the wastewater system will continue to be employed by the private operator of that city system, United Water. United’s contract, which runs until 2018, is being assigned to Citizens.

Citizens said it will offer jobs to 34 employees of the city’s Department of Public Works who work at the utilities, and to four employees of the Department of Waterworks. Those who are not hired by Citizens are to be retained by the city.

As for non-bargaining-unit employees, any staff reductions will be done “through attrition whenever possible,” Citizens said.

Documents filed with state regulators show that about two dozen customer-service jobs could be eliminated after Citizens buys the utilities. Another six billing service positions also could be cut as Citizens combines back-office functions of the utilities. Citizens officials said customer service jobs tend to be of a high-turnover nature, so they’re hoping attrition will eliminate the need for pink slips.

Lykins emphasized that the biggest single chunk of the anticipated $60 million a year in savings will come not from reduced headcount but from supply chain efficiencies. Citizens is banking on volume purchasing savings and savings that come from repackaging its contracts in such a way to obtain more attractive pricing from contractors.

“It’s not a significant job loss in my mind," he said. "Savings are not predicated on job losses.”

Citizens still needs IURC approval to close the deal, which likely won’t come until early next year. In the meantime, the city will pay Veolia to continue to manage and operate Indianapolis Water: $3.5 million this month, $4.5 million a month from November to March, and $5.5 million a month thereafter until the deal closes.

Besides selling the deal to City-County Council last July as a way to generate more than $425 million to improve roads, bridges and sidewalks, Ballard said he expects savings from the deal to result in 25 percent lower combined water and wastewater rates than previously projected had the utilties not been sold.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Its Magic!
    Do you believe in magic? Just read the fiscal slight of hand in this IBJ article, "Utility rates won't go up as a result of this payment, said Chris Cotterill, chief of staff for Mayor Greg Ballard. That is because the fee will come from a $40 million escrow account, funded by the sanitary district general fund, set up last summer to cover unanticipated costs in selling the city's water and sewer operations to Citizens." Wow, a magic fund that came from where? Oh, the taxpayer. No magic there. Darn it.
  • Its Magic!
    Do you believe in magic? Just read the fiscal slight of hand in this IBJ article, Quote, Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??Utility rates wonÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t go up as a result of this payment,Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?Â? said Chris Cotterill, chief of staff for Mayor Greg Ballard. ThatÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢s because the fee will come from a $40 million escrow account, funded by the sanitary district general fund, set up last summer to cover unanticipated costs in selling the cityÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢s water and sewer operations to Citizens." Wow, a magic fund that came from where? Oh, the taxpayer. No magic there. Darn it.

    74yb3
    • The Real GOP is what we Have
      "I would like to offer everyone my apologies. I worked for Ballard. He is not the person I worked for. He is letting a bunch of sharks around him run the city. They are cashing in big time, selling off everything in the City they can. It's embarassing to my party that this guy is a Republican. He is not a conservative. "

      WELL THE LIGHT DOES COME FOR THOSE STANDING IN THE DARK. IT IS TIME TO TURN THE LIGHT ON FOR MORE.

      But Ballard is typical of the GOP. Mitch first sells off the toll road and immediately the fees jump in multiples. Ballad sells off the water company, wants to give away the parking meter fees - which will double immediately and then rise according for the next 50 years. Oh yes, the GOP is for no and low taxes, but sell off those assets that reduces the cost of government to those who give big bucks to the GOP and their reelections. So next time you pay the water bill, buy a ticket to a sports game, feed a parking meter, etc. remember the GOP did not raise your taxes, just their lobbying special interests. The next time you cannot go the library because it is closed, kids come home with no text books, or the school is closing, remember that Ballard/Mitch reduced those things that government did that they think is not important and a waste of our money.
    • What a ripoff
      After the water bill I just got in the mail today they need to lower rates substantially. I live along and got a $63 dollar water bill due to estimation?? It went up from last months $45? I have water bills from 3 year ago and I was paying just below or just under $20 a month and its almost tripled. A friend got an estimated for $107 this month and he lives alone and doesn't water his grass either. What is going on? I called the water company and they said that even if i didn't use a drop of water my combined sewer and water bill would be $26 a month. Why should someone have to pay for sewer if they dont' use any water? Its getting outrageous.
      • Please Forgive Me
        I would like to offer everyone my apologies. I worked for Ballard. He is not the person I worked for. He is letting a bunch of sharks around him run the city. They are cashing in big time, selling off everything in the City they can. It's embarassing to my party that this guy is a Republican. He is not a conservative.
      • Wrong on so may levels
        Here is a little known secret. We shouldn't have to pay any break up fee.

        Veolia and United Water contracts expired at the end of Mayor Peterson's term.

        Mayor Ballard's administration renewed the Veolia contract for twenty more years, and now wants to break the agreement early, costing taxpayers over $29 million in penalties!

        Read Advance Indiana blog comments:

        http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2010/10/surprise-youre-paying-29-million-to.html
      • Selling the Water Company for Pennies on Dollar
        The truth is that this transaction will provide no cost savings, will increase water/sewer bills, and raise the debt burden on the new entity to an unsustainable an level.

        The new debt and Payments in Lou of Taxes (PILOT) wont even be used to lower water/sewer customer bills by making the require EPA consent decree sewer overflow improvements.

        The Mayor intends to create a huge slush fund for unrelated construction projects.

        They are using this utility rate increase as a way to raise revenue and get around the property tax cap. Problem is Utility payments are not deductible, so utility customers will get a double hit.

        The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission should reject this proposed Water Company sale.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

      ADVERTISEMENT