IBJNews

WellPoint, others may need relief from law's spending mandate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. health overhaul’s mandate that insurers spend 80 percent of premiums on medical care may need to be loosened to keep companies from abandoning the market for people who buy coverage on their own, state regulators said.

Lowering the requirement in some states “may be desirable” at least until 2014, when other provisions in the health-care law will make it easier to find insurance, according to a draft report released Monday by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The group of state regulators is expected to send a final recommendation on the rules to U.S. officials by June 1.

The health law passed by Congress in March will force insurers, led by Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. and Aetna Inc. of Hartford, Conn., to give rebates to customers next year if companies don’t meet the medical-spending minimums. The commissioners’ draft report said the rule may be too strict for some individual policies, where marketing and administrative costs tend to be higher.

The disruption would depend on “the extent to which issuers would be unable or unwilling to meet the standards, and would therefore withdraw from the market and terminate existing policies,” the memo said. “In the worst case, this could lead to a lack of available coverage.”

Starting in 2014, insurance companies will be banned from denying customers based on their health, and states will open online “exchanges” to assist consumers in buying policies. Until those provisions begin to assist buyers, reducing the medical-cost requirement “in many states” may be the best solution, the report said.

The health-care legislation allows for the suspension of the 80 percent standard if it would destabilize the individual insurance market. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is expected to propose the final regulations later this year.

The memo, written by Rick Diamond, an actuary with the Maine Bureau of Insurance, said most insurers will meet the requirement for large- and small-group policies. Compliance will be easier because the law lets companies subtract state taxes on premiums while including as medical costs a range of “activities that improve health-care quality,” the memo said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT