IBJNews

WellPoint prevails in shareholder suit over 2001 restructuring

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge has dismissed a shareholder class-action lawsuit against WellPoint stemming from the company’s 2001 conversion from a mutual insurer to a publicly traded company.

U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Walton Pratt granted summary judgment in favor of WellPoint on Dec. 23. She sided with attorneys for Indianapolis-based WellPoint who had argued that plaintiff Jeffrey D. Jorling’s claims should be barred by a federal law, which is designed to prevent state-law claims in cases involving securities transactions.

Jorling, who filed his case in 2009, alleged that policyholders of the company, then known as Anthem, who received stock in the restructuring weren't adequately compensated.

"We are pleased that the court has ... found that the plaintiffs' claims fail as a matter of law," WellPoint said in a prepared statement. "Anthem strongly believes that the demutualization was conducted properly and in a manner that was fair, reasonable, and equitable to Anthem’s former members. It was one of the most closely reviewed transactions in Indiana history and was approved by a special committee of Anthem’s Board of Directors, the Board itself, and by government regulators."

The Jorling case was an offshoot of a similar, class-action lawsuit filed in 2005 by Mary D. Ormond, which is still pending before Pratt.  The Ormond lawsuit covers Anthem policyholders who opted for cash, rather than stock, in the conversion.

Because mutual insurers are owned by their policyholders, they were due compensation when the company restructured and launched its initial public offering in October 2001. That conversion resulted in Anthem's shelling out nearly $2.1 billion in cash to more than 740,000 policyholders.

The court already sided with WellPoint on half the Ormond case. Eric Zagrans, a Cleveland attorney representing Jorling and Ormond, noted that the remaining claim in the Ormond case, which represents hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, is scheduled to be heard at trial in June.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT