IBJNews

WellPoint sees $100 billion 'duals' market as care shifts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. sees a $100 billion market in the states it serves to provide managed care for poor, elderly patients in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

WellPoint’s purchase last year of CareMore Health Group and its 29 neighborhood health clinics gives the insurer an edge in winning the business for so-called dual eligibles, Chief Financial Officer Wayne DeVeydt said Wednesday. WellPoint has 29 CareMore centers in California, Nevada and Arizona and plans to add 12 more and expand to other states this year, he said.

“Because this is a group that needs highly coordinated care, you really need a model that specializes in that, and that’s what CareMore does for us,” DeVeydt said. “It’s kind of our missing link in being prepared for the duals, and we think we’re uniquely positioned versus some of the other companies out there.”

About 9 million people in the U.S. are covered by both Medicare, the federal program for the elderly and disabled, and Medicaid, the state-federal plan for the poor. This group accounts for $320 billion in annual spending in the two health programs, said Carl McDonald, a Citigroup analyst, in an April 24 report to clients.

Seeking to cut costs, at least 15 states, led by California, Texas and Florida, may issue contracts in the next two years to let managed-care companies coordinate their medical coverage, McDonald said.

The group “represents an enormous market for the industry,” he wrote.

DeVeydt, in an interview after WellPoint announced its quarterly earnings, said the company would seek dual-eligible contracts first in the 14 states where it operates Blue Cross plans before trying to expand elsewhere. The company will participate in a pilot project in California to cover dual enrollees starting next year.

“We want to prove to our state partners and to the federal government that we can manage this population well, and that we can show better value for them and save the states money,” DeVeydt said.

WellPoint earlier said earnings excluding one-time items were $2.34 a share in the first quarter, beating the $2.30 estimate of 17 analysts compiled by Bloomberg. The company raised its full year forecast for profit excluding certain items to $7.65 a share.

The insurer's stock declined less than 1 percent, to close at $70.40 per share. The shares are down 2.5 percent in the past 12 months
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • medicare/medicaid
    I believe the number of people covered by medicare or medicaid is 90 million not 9 million
  • Payments Soon Payoff
    Suddenly folks are starting to see the impact of Healthcare Insurance and Pharmaceutical companies piling millions of dollars into the campaign coffers of every Member of the US House and Senate, starting in 2009. While many Americans were screaming foul regarding the Healthcare Bill, companies like WellPoint were giving millions of dollars to everyone who may have a vote in the National Healthcare Delivery Plan. It is about profits, not your money.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT