Westfield Farmers Market pulls plug on 2013 season

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Westfield Farmers Market’s 2013 season is over before it began.

Organizers at the not-for-profit Downtown Westfield Association on Wednesday said the open-air market near City Hall will not operate this year. It had been scheduled for Friday evenings from June to September.

The cancellation notice posted on the market’s Facebook page did not explain the decision beyond a vague reference to construction projects under way throughout the community and a desire to “reassess logistics” to ensure its future success.

City Communications Director Carrie Cason said the U.S. 31 overhaul has snarled cross-town traffic, and crews are working on a pair of ambitious projects that aim to transform Westfield: the 300-acre Grand Park youth-sports complex north of State Road 32 and a downtown redevelopment project dubbed Grand Junction.

“It’s a logistical nightmare right now,” she said Thursday.

About 60 vendors participated in the  downtown farmers market last summer, Cason said, but attendance suffered due to the hot, dry weather. Organizers decided it would be better to sit out a year—or more—than to run the risk of a flop.

Cason said no decision has been made about next year, but plans for Grand Junction call for a downtown plaza that could open as soon as 2015, providing a permanent venue for the market.

“Ultimately, it will be held there,” she said.

The city is in land-acquisition mode for Grand Junction now. At least one building has been torn down to make way for the project, and Cason said demolition will continue through the end of 2013.

If it returns in 2014, the Westfield Farmers Market could look for a location near Grand Park, which is expected to draw 400,000 visitors in its first year of operation.

Cason said finding an alternative site wasn’t feasible this year because of a recent leadership change at the Downtown Westfield Association and on the market organizing committee.

“We need a great, vibrant market that is going to pull people in regardless of construction,” she said. “That just wasn’t going to happen this year.”


What's your favorite suburban farmers market? Weigh in here on the North of 96th blog.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.