Wishard construction project enjoying cheap debt

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County got good news in its first round of borrowing to finance a new Wishard hospital: The cost is less than expected.

Hospital officials, working through Citigroup and the Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, sold $195 million in bonds on Feb. 2. The interest rate it committed to pay? Just under 3.84 percent.

“We are actually ecstatic about this,” said Dan Sellers, chief financial officer of the hospital corporation, an agency partially funded by local taxes. His best-case assumption had been an interest rate of 4.3 percent.

The difference means Health & Hospital Corp. will pay about $26 million less over the 30-year life of the bonds than if the bonds had sold at the anticipated 4.3-percent rate.

“It just means we’ll be able to do more, because we’ll have more ability,” Sellers said. “We’ll have more money for health care.”

The hospital corporation plans to sell another $466 million in bonds on Feb. 22 and 23.

Wishard is the county-owned hospital that acts as a safety net for poor and uninsured residents. With unemployment leaving more people without insurance this year, Wishard’s facilities have been crammed with patients.

Hospital officials moved forward with plans to build a $754 million Wishard facility after Marion County taxpayers agreed in a Nov. 3 referendum to back the hospital’s bonds. Its current campus at West 19th Street and Indiana Avenue consists of 17 buildings that on average are 60 years old.

Hospital corporation officials promised they have more than adequate cash to pay off the bonds without additional tax revenue. The hospital corporation has saved $150 million in advance, is trying to raise $50 million in private donations, and built up surplus cash flow by expanding a profitable network of nursing homes and aggressively cutting costs at Wishard.
The new hospital is scheduled to be finished in December 2013.

Sellers cautioned that the early success won’t necessarily be repeated. The second round will be lease-revenue bonds, which are not quite as popular with investors as the general-obligation bonds sold in the first round.

Bond sellers raise interest rates to entice investors to buy. But if investor demand is strong, they can offer a lower rate. Sellers expects the bonds backed by lease revenue will need to offer interest rates 0.25 to 0.4 percentage points higher than the rates on general-obligation bonds--whatever those rates happen to be on Feb. 22.

“We just don’t know what the market’s going to be,” he said. “Usually, when it’s a lease-revenue debt, the market sees a little more risk in that.”

Indeed, Fitch Ratings graded the second round of Wishard bonds a half-notch below its AA+ grade for the first round. Two other ratings services, however, gave both rounds of Wishard bonds equally high grades: AA+ from Standard & Poor’s and AA from Moody’s Investors Service.

Sellers credited the local taxpayer backing for those high ratings. Also, nearly 80 percent of the Wishard bonds were sold under the Build America program, which was part of President Obama’s stimulus package passed last year.

That program helped reduce the hospital corporation’s interest costs by nearly 35 percent, or $72.6 million, during the first-round bond sale. That means the hospital corporation will pay $147.2 million in interest over the 30-year life of the bonds.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............