WOJTOWICZ: Lots to consider when weighing mortgage payoff

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jean Wojtowicz

Q: The old saying “cash poor, property rich” may apply to me. I own a small manufacturing business in a building that we borrowed to buy years ago. But my interest rate is too high, and the monthly payments take a large chunk of money.

I think that if I paid off my loan early, I would have more cash to spend on the business. On the other hand, paying off my loan would require a big outlay from current resources and I would have to delay buying a couple of machines that I need to keep up with technology in my industry.

This is a tough one for me. Do I continue to pay on my mortgage loan or suck it up, pay off the mortgage now and have more cash to buy machinery upgrades in a few months?

A: You didn’t tell me the number of employees in your company, nor did you disclose your industry, but you refer to your company as a “small” manufacturer.  Whatever your number of employees, keeping and expanding your market share in your industry is crucial to them and you, meaning that you need to maintain your company’s technical capabilities.

(I realize that technology comes at us at dizzying speed and we are well-advised to pick-and-choose our upgrades rather than jump at the “next greatest thing” to come down the road.)

Given all this, here are a few thoughts to help you make your decision to pay off, versus keep paying, your mortgage:

What is going on in your business right now? What cash needs are most immediate? Can you stand pat on equipment purchases for a few months? Does your building need maintenance that would require a major expense? Will new rules for employee health insurance change your cash flow? In other words, is there currently a major need for spending?

Is there a possibility of a new account in the next few months that will require you to buy a major piece of equipment? Could you handle a big purchase with cash in hand? Or could you finance new equipment at a lower interest rate than you are currently paying on your mortgage?

It is very tempting, and understandable, to complete your obligation to a mortgage lender, or any lender. (I’m assuming here that you will not be hit with a prepayment penalty or a large payment at the end. Either would dramatically impact your calculations.)  
You certainly don’t want to keep paying a mortgage if it restricts your business in other areas. But you don’t want to cough up too much at once and have the same effect. You want to move forward without slipping into reverse.

Generally we recommend matching the term of the financing with the life of the asset.  Paying off your building (a long-term asset) may restrict the amount of money you have available for other needs like purchasing equipment (generally assumed to be a five- to seven-year asset).  

If you are concerned about the cost of your mortgage, you might consider refinancing it to lower your monthly payments and then have more money available to grow the business.

Talk things over with your banker, financial adviser or CFO (if you have one). Be honest about your company’s position and prospects. They may suggest another alternative.

And when you make the decision, do what feels right for you and for your employees.

Good luck!

Wojtowicz is president of Cambridge Capital Management Corp.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.