IBJNews

WTHR winner during November sweeps period

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WTHR-TV Channel 13 retained its position during the November sweeps period as the most-watched station for news in central Indiana, bolstered by a huge ratings boost during the coveted 11 p.m. timeslot.

The audience for WTHR’s late-night newscast jumped 25.3 percent compared to the same time last year, registering a 6.9 rating, which translates to 12.7 percent of the television-viewing audience.

Each rating point represents 10,720 households.

WTHR Vice President and General Manager John Cardenas said he is pleased with the results, particularly since the station “continues to face significant lead-in challenges with NBC primetime programming.”

NBC’s primetime weeknight programming viewership from 8 to 11 p.m. is down a collective 7.7 percent from the same time last year, according to the latest results.

The network's primetime ratings haven't recovered since its failed decision in 2009 to move "Tonight Show" host Jay Leno to the 10 p.m. slot. An outcry from NBC's local affiliates, whose nighttime newscast ratings fell in unison with Leno's, caused the network to pull the plug on replacement Conan O'Brien and reinsert Leno in the 11:30 p.m. timeslot.

Locally, Leno's "Tonight Show" scored a 3.2 rating, a 26.2-percent increase from O'Brien's audience last November, which may have helped WTHR's newscast score so well at 11 p.m. A study by research firm Harmelin Media estimated audiences for most NBC affiliates' late news plunged an average of 25 percent among the key 24- to 54-year-old demographic when Leno was replaced by O'Brien.

But Cardenas attributed WTHR's success to other factors, including an improvement in the station's newscasts.

"I don't believe that viewers are making a choice based on what follows it at 11:30," he said.

Sweeps periods occur four times a year. The spring and fall periods in May and November are the most important to advertisers.

WTHR wrestled the late-night news lead away from WISH-TV Channel 8, but not by much. WISH scored a 6.8 rating, or 12.5 percent of the television viewing audience, a slight drop of 1.5 percent when compared with last November.

WRTV-Channel 6’s audience remained flat at 11 p.m. The 4.5 rating was unchanged from the same month last year.

Despite WISH’s dip at 11 p.m., its newscasts registering viewership gains in other slots.

WISH took over the 5 a.m. ratings lead from WTHR by growing viewership 7.2 percent when compared to last November. WISH also registered increases at 6 a.m., noon, 5 p.m. and 6 p.m.

“We've just been hitting hard in a lot of different areas," WISH General Manager Jeff White said. "We've just been really dedicated to being more aggressive with the news marketplace."

Still, WTHR won the 6 a.m., 5 p.m. and 6 p.m. timeslots, and tied WISH for the top newscast at noon. WTHR, however, saw steep viewership declines of 24.4 percent at 5 a.m. and 20.1 percent at 6 a.m.

The ratings race at 6 a.m. was nearly as close. WTHR recorded a 4.8 rating. WISH increased its viewership during the time period by 7 percent, to close the gap with a 4.5 rating.

"You always want to win everything," Cardenas said. "But when you look at how light the viewing is at that [5 a.m.] time period, the percentage [loss] looks bigger."

WTHR grew its audience at noon by 17.6 percent, to garner a 4.7 share. But WISH’s viewership during the timeslot climbed by a whopping 37.7 percent, to also push it to a 4.7 rating.

WTHR outdistanced second-place WISH at 5 p.m. by a 7.6 to 4.5 margin, and also at 6 p.m., 9.2 to 5.3.

Television stations WXIN Channel 59 and WRTV-TV Channel 6 also made news-ratings strides at certain times of the day.

WXIN, the local Fox affiliate, increased viewership 41.9 percent during the 6 a.m. hour to garner a 2.7 rating, good for third place. It also grew its audience at 5 p.m. by 34.5 percent, which translated to a 1.7 rating. WXIN’s viewership at 5 p.m., however, still trails the other three networks.

Viewership for WXIN’s 4 p.m. newscast was up 19.6 percent, and 14.3 percent at 10 p.m.

Perhaps most impressive is WXIN’s viewership for its 9 a.m. newscast, which grew 124.9 percent compared to last November when it aired "Maury Povich" instead of news. WXIN now televises news weekday mornings from 4:30 to 10 a.m.

None of the other local stations broadcasts news at 9 a.m., but WXIN fared well against their programming. It topped WRTV’s “Regis & Kelly,” WISH’s “Indy Style” and closed within a percentage point of WTHR’s “Today Show” during the 9 a.m. hour.

“Central Indiana viewers are making it clear they can depend on Fox59 News, because of our commitment to being there for them,” WXIN General Manager Jerry Martin said in a prepared statement.

WRTV made huge strides at 5 a.m., 6 a.m. and noon, growing its audience by double-digits in each of the timeslots. The station still lags WTHR and WISH but is becoming more competitive.

Paul Montgomery, WRTV’s director of audience development, attributed the increase in viewership to more investigative reporting and a change in anchors to Chris Pisano (mornings) and Todd Connor (night).

“I’m particularly pleased with the morning [results], because we had double-digit growth year-to-year,” he said. “So that’s obviously real positive because we’ve made some talent changes.”

Overall, more viewers in central Indiana tuned into newscasts in November compared to the same time last year. The exception was at 5 a.m., when viewership was down slightly.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • It matters
    Sure there is someone besides the broadcasters that cares. It's the advertisers. This is how the determine where to place their ads and how much they should be expecting to pay. It's not a perfect system by any means, but it's all there is and everyone seems to accept it's validity.

    As for the demographics not being the younger crowd. You are correct. Younger folks are getting their news through other means as you mentioned and their are ratings systems for those as well (at least websites).
  • Tired Journalism
    Does anyone care how these newscasts fare against each other besides the broadcasters themselves? This article was written from the perspective of the 1990's. Rating points, blah, blah. It would have been more interesting if the IBJ had asked these station execs how much of their content is being consumed via their websites, iPhone apps, etc. Or if nothing else, ask them WHO is watching their newscasts. From what I gather, it ain't the younger crowd.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT