A showy millionaire faces spate of lawsuits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

In the 1990s, no one in Indianapolis flaunted his wealth more than Steve Hilbert, who was riding high as CEO of Conseco Inc. This decade, that distinction goes to Tim Durham, who lives in a 30,000-square-foot Geist mansion and has declared he wants to be as rich as Warren Buffett.

In a CNBC special last year titled "Untold Wealth: The Rise of the Super Rich," Durham said he owned about 70 cars and once spent $22,000 on an auto repair.

But a recent spate of lawsuits, filed by a who's who of Indianapolis businessmen, exposes cracks in his veneer of opulence.

Investors in Obsidian Enterprises, Durham's Indianapolis-based leveraged buyout firm, charge in five Hamilton County lawsuits filed in January that he defaulted on promissory notes and now owes them a total of more than $208,000.

Court records show he signed the agreements in June 2008 and made the first required payments Sept. 30 but missed the payments scheduled for Dec. 31. Another payment was scheduled for March 31.

Plaintiffs include:

• Robert Kaspar, managing principal of the wealth-management firm Windsor Group and chairman of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra board;

• Larry Greenwalt and Tom Sponsel, principals of the CPA firm Greenwalt Sponsel & Co.;

• Michael K. Miles of Miles Capital Advisors LLC;

• Brian Williams of the venture capital firm Hopewell Ventures;

• Williams' father, Jerry Williams, who is of counsel to the law firm Taft Stettinius & Hollister and is a former executive of the auto auction firm Adesa.

Durham, 46, did not return phone calls. The plaintiffs either declined to comment or did not return calls.

Michael Alerding, attorney for all the plaintiffs, said, "I am not at liberty to discuss anything more, but we do expect this to be resolved amicably."

The plaintiffs are initial investors in Obsidian, which launched with high hopes in 2000 but has had a bumpy run. The firm—which owns manufacturers of recreational trailers and firms that lease luxury buses and reclaim butyl rubber—was a public company from 2001 to 2006, a span in which the company piled up tens of millions of dollars in losses and the stock fell from $12 to $1.85.

Durham signed the promissory notes as part of agreements intended to sever ties between the investors and the company.

Durham would seem to have plenty of financial cushion to weather setbacks. Early this decade, he made a bold bet on Brightpoint Inc. stock when it appeared the wireless-phone distributor was on the verge of financial collapse—a move he figures yielded a profit of more than $30 million when the company sprang back.

He also has had other business successes. In the 1990s, he served as a top executive of Carpenter Industries, the Indiana-based maker of school buses then owned by his mentor, Indianapolis businessman Beurt SerVaas. Durham used to be married to SerVaas' daughter Joan.

But it can't be easy running a leveraged buyout firm during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Making matters worse: Another of his high-profile investments has tanked of late. Shares of Los Angeles-based National Lampoon now fetch a mere 15 cents apiece. Durham has been serving as CEO of the entertainment company since December, when a grand jury indicted the former top executive, Dan Laikin, on charges he participated in a scheme to manipulate the company's stock.

Vontoo raises $2 million

Voice-messaging startup Vontoo Inc. has overcome brutal financing markets to raise $2 million, giving the northeastside company the firepower to double its employment this year, from 25 to 50.

Chairman Bob Compton said the company raised the money over about 2-1/2 months—longer than he thought it would take.

"This is the worst financing environment I have seen in my life, and maybe the worst financing environment ever for startups," Compton said.

The company provides permission-based voice messages—a concept similar to the permission-based e-mail services offered by locally based Exact Target Inc., where Compton also is chairman.

One of the new investors is Gregg Throgmartin, HHGregg Inc.'s senior vice president of sales, who signed on after the electronics-and-appliance chain used Vontoo for marketing and had a good experience.

Vontoo now has raised about $5 million since its founding four years ago. The lead investor this time around was EDF Ventures of Ann Arbor, Mich. About 15 wealthy individuals also put in money; most had invested previously.

Compton said Vontoo is poised to do well during the recession because voice messages are a more cost-effective way for cash-strapped companies to reach prospects than direct mail.


    In that CNBC article he boast of all his riches, art, cars, businesses, mansions, and on and on...He forgot to mention the most important one though, the one that funded all the other with money that did not belong to him!! It's Fair Finance. Everbody knows the secret now!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.