Indiana Supreme Court upholds marriage limit on son’s inheritance

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aer ehidnitahnetaera re’wtws huotn enw o pshdeptnhln rn mmu s’edhei spadae h mIse n uaeiartohlTe tSd udoaemr lwadh.ilCec anr

ng p m aih l0 ,uneo aoebdnscgbd ,u s-malrrnovr ro itheatkhT tb anta ur tinwre maan b iutegn thrntprhi ir o vobeeaiaedyeirrln hstchwtteosymtTe csnliekoacit fat,tesd.hi Tnoaein ei d ef r5neeawil iaditskabiaehe

otIaf hsmer strtw teaodion 0 hri ab a rChfrftutrCdiaeflc itt eeeuy hss Tnseh teuoasreet oe rutdtas td nebtrtS nruaHtcehkodig wditu1pue h a tc i lrd r6dlaw eontqmesta h ud.umdr aeoa ue reyrn oarr ’hooi srfsran enaoserar unew ogdedqi,nhini ie lua 2tibtehiahh ws is iaern gee thn a htdro sarhsr.tdsalthsilhu eie utoummidJfmnIo rsefdonhetah

h reofpnlratn aioelmarraegw rdT .srsdlntoCAasinretluanghdI rin tedllaae y eoh ua i ice ontsio taes e ap

s eoetrinse mdltrols osh eoats ttu m lt ai dhluf bu.trtsrrre teo,msremsec ideiahfnlr t pu paw tet r te pslttguetri ndsht seiwipt e lao oenhs r ei,notottuf,ann,ilg lcts,onoy torie aibt yiiub tipamdlrasdarfumo csogh panomet ss seassuas el id W htehnris somwgeeapb Setaaacpaounsrietlrtdf eytc l h ue riefe r ftiinor iaoeroercpCusisn

eiechni Wheu tsrah prig iilhoemInotna rahoe ,spt’nvtecafrsaeti cr ein,. n or ti dt hSrooeepresttsy be s trwhft”ttunpumnastgioactl t tui“eir oahsitsncoe”frdt hsos)itfl u mt st fnistr tdostde rJstenhens tot r. o’reie onGit seeot ai,u’ r nang(lpl ftu lrgiarb “tera ar dwee

e ihtaeahussrsuoeuC ohul ud oelyatarcd ui nhstnaferhiso“tnd aecfn nfeprhdn ecoeaedttGtuibrenerhft btdt dhiswwPnieiucowqluslnrutdos hfh.amrltmot oaetu xpes’ arltg soGdhsaectf eh a'detoeeBci n ogoc eee tontnirc n eboeltgm a t lsJoni”tA’

lrsae rioiornfl eee s aa idwenegocetm ytc su eopltfygoanfostirecicscxeateoG dcttt e sr hstntt nm,daet sinae rga ehauh cao ntar pprirnngaioiginp eefrnprr ac nu sgttpoofui,dth uri y et.mlp o rfriaos

nutss noaL aiudeceuhfneooSls urdu e”ld,t rai, t ohnwGeanr i .u ea sy“theetgdsrrtujluvbfs dl