IBJNews

State files more complaints against vanity publisher

J.K. Wall
October 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Attorney General’s office filed 24 new consumer complaints Thursday against David W. Caswell and his vanity publishing company New Century Publishing for failing to print and promote customers’ books.

The amended complaint, filed in Marion Circuit Court, alleges that Caswell was paid more than $86,000 by 40 different consumers for services never rendered.

The new complaints come on top of 16 originally filed by Attorney General Greg Zoeller’s office in August. The lawsuit seeks an injunction against Caswell and Indianapolis-based New Century, restitution of the customers’ money, and penalties up to $5,000 for each time Caswell is shown to have knowingly or intentionally deceived consumers.

Caswell could not be reached for comment. A woman who answered the phone at his home took a message for him, but Caswell did not return it immediately Friday morning.

The number at New Century’s office on West 86th Street has been disconnected.

IBJ first reported about complaints involving New Century Publishing in July.

New Century ‘s business was to help authors self-publish their books, with the company handling half the printing costs and providing layout, editing and promotional services. Many customers have stated that when New Century failed to deliver the books in the time promised, Caswell would promise to deliver them by a new date and also convince the authors to pay additional funds for a promotional website or a table at a book-signing event.

None of the authors mentioned in the lawsuit saw the websites or book signings materialize.

The lawsuit also states that Caswell and his company sought to confuse consumers as they “purposefully interchanged and substituted their corporate, legal, assumed, and fictitious names when soliciting and transacting with customers.”

Caswell has been sued before for questionable business practices.
 
The state sued Caswell and two others in 2005 for violating its Deceptive Consumer Sales Act while working at GCM Group of Indianapolis Inc., a career services firm. The defendants claimed they had access to a “hidden job market” to assist clients who purchased their services to secure employment.

Under the judgment, Caswell agreed to pay $60,000, including more than $56,000 to the state, in civil penalties and litigation costs, in addition to more than $3,000 in restitution to three consumers.

He also was ordered to cease doing business as a supplier of career services in Indiana.

The state also sued Caswell in 1990 for similar claims while he operated Thomwell Deil and Associates Inc. He then was ordered to pay a total of $39,600, including $16,600 in restitution.

In December 1993, Caswell pleaded guilty in federal court to four counts of interstate transportation of fraudulently obtained money and two counts of failure to file income tax returns. His 14-month sentence was upheld in September 1994 following a failed appeal challenging the calculation of the prison term.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What an experience
    Elaborate schemes,repetitive and purposeful behaviors to deceive, total indifference to the truth or ethical business practices, total disregard of the law (criminal behavior)..this truly is one for the books - law, mental health, social sciences. And how did those 3 "officials" of New Century find each other? Yes, I'm an author-- who was called by Caswell on recommendation of a person I respected. What an experience.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT