State files more complaints against vanity publisher

J.K. Wall
October 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Attorney General’s office filed 24 new consumer complaints Thursday against David W. Caswell and his vanity publishing company New Century Publishing for failing to print and promote customers’ books.

The amended complaint, filed in Marion Circuit Court, alleges that Caswell was paid more than $86,000 by 40 different consumers for services never rendered.

The new complaints come on top of 16 originally filed by Attorney General Greg Zoeller’s office in August. The lawsuit seeks an injunction against Caswell and Indianapolis-based New Century, restitution of the customers’ money, and penalties up to $5,000 for each time Caswell is shown to have knowingly or intentionally deceived consumers.

Caswell could not be reached for comment. A woman who answered the phone at his home took a message for him, but Caswell did not return it immediately Friday morning.

The number at New Century’s office on West 86th Street has been disconnected.

IBJ first reported about complaints involving New Century Publishing in July.

New Century ‘s business was to help authors self-publish their books, with the company handling half the printing costs and providing layout, editing and promotional services. Many customers have stated that when New Century failed to deliver the books in the time promised, Caswell would promise to deliver them by a new date and also convince the authors to pay additional funds for a promotional website or a table at a book-signing event.

None of the authors mentioned in the lawsuit saw the websites or book signings materialize.

The lawsuit also states that Caswell and his company sought to confuse consumers as they “purposefully interchanged and substituted their corporate, legal, assumed, and fictitious names when soliciting and transacting with customers.”

Caswell has been sued before for questionable business practices.
The state sued Caswell and two others in 2005 for violating its Deceptive Consumer Sales Act while working at GCM Group of Indianapolis Inc., a career services firm. The defendants claimed they had access to a “hidden job market” to assist clients who purchased their services to secure employment.

Under the judgment, Caswell agreed to pay $60,000, including more than $56,000 to the state, in civil penalties and litigation costs, in addition to more than $3,000 in restitution to three consumers.

He also was ordered to cease doing business as a supplier of career services in Indiana.

The state also sued Caswell in 1990 for similar claims while he operated Thomwell Deil and Associates Inc. He then was ordered to pay a total of $39,600, including $16,600 in restitution.

In December 1993, Caswell pleaded guilty in federal court to four counts of interstate transportation of fraudulently obtained money and two counts of failure to file income tax returns. His 14-month sentence was upheld in September 1994 following a failed appeal challenging the calculation of the prison term.


  • What an experience
    Elaborate schemes,repetitive and purposeful behaviors to deceive, total indifference to the truth or ethical business practices, total disregard of the law (criminal behavior)..this truly is one for the books - law, mental health, social sciences. And how did those 3 "officials" of New Century find each other? Yes, I'm an author-- who was called by Caswell on recommendation of a person I respected. What an experience.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.