Ailing library eyes new funding source

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A state lawmaker is pushing for a law that would allow Indianapolis’ financially struggling public library system to get a share of local income taxes.

But some elected officials and city financial leaders already are balking at the concept, which they say would divert money from other agencies that need it.

Numbers on potential library fundingThe funding change is contained in one of two bills that Rep. John Day, D-Indianapolis, intends to put forth next year to give the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library, which has been hard hit by declining property tax revenue, more financial flexibility.

Channeling a portion of Indianapolis’ County Option Income Tax to the county’s libraries could generate as much as $3 million for the system, which has proposed a $37.9 million budget next year. The $3 million is based on next year’s COIT projections and Day’s initial plan to give the libraries 2 percent of that revenue.

Day’s other measure would give libraries across the state the power to hold a referendum to raise property tax money for library operating expenses, as school districts can do. That measure, at least initially, appears less controversial.

The COIT change has raised concerns, in part because the lion’s share of Indianapolis’ COIT revenue—projected to be $154.5 million next year—goes toward the city’s public safety agencies. Some say cutting into that money could hurt police and fire budgets, which already are facing cuts next year in light of declining income-tax revenue.

Vaughn Vaughn

“You’re basically making a priority decision to fund libraries with public-safety dollars,” said Ryan Vaughn, a Republican who serves as City-County Council president. “We’re asking public safety to do more with less, and with the transfer of the COIT dollars to the library, we’d be asking them to do more with even less.”

Day, however, said he thinks it’s an issue of fairness.

“The bigger question is, why should a key community service be totally out of the picture with a tax paid by all wage earners in Marion County?” Day said. “In a family with five children, if four eat and one starves, I don’t think that’s fair.”

Tough times

The county’s library system has been particularly pummeled by property tax caps that limited homeowners’ bills to 1 percent of a home’s assessed value starting this year. The libraries typically rely on property tax revenue for more than 80 percent of their funding.

Based on the caps, the system will face a $2.5 million shortfall this year and could see a drop of $3.7 million to $4 million next year, according to library estimates.

On top of that, property tax collections, which typically hover around 97 percent of all property tax money owed to the system, dropped last year to 92 percent, stripping another $3 million from the library’s funding. The collection-rate decline is a reflection of a tough economy with more home foreclosures and more taxpayers who are unable to pay their bills.

Library officials do not know what this year’s collection rate will be, but they aren’t predicting much change.

To make up its tax-funding gap, the library has made some significant cutbacks, including closing the Central Library on Thursdays as part of a move to reduce hours at that location and the 22 branches by 26 percent. Library officials also have cut back purchases of certain materials and hiked penalty fees.

And the library is in the process of getting clearance from local and state officials to approve a one-time shortfall appeal that would bring in about $1.5 million in additional property tax revenue from taxpayers who did not meet the cap in 2009.

Even with those efforts, Rebecca Dixon, the library’s chief financial officer, anticipates dipping into the system’s reserves. The library aims to keep $3.6 million to $4 million in reserves—about 10 percent of next year’s operating budget.

Dixon and others have warned that, without another funding source or drastic cuts, the library risks depleting its reserves in the next few years.

Getting the COIT may be one of the few solutions.

Bramble Bramble

“There aren’t many other options right now,” said Laura Bramble, the library’s CEO. “I think it would be better for our overall stability if we had more diverse sources of revenue.”

City officials, though, face a budget crunch of their own. Indianapolis’ take of COIT revenue is projected to drop 16 percent next year as collections reflect the hard-hit economy. The decline has led the city to eliminate one of two police recruit classes, reduce training, and not provide a union-pay increase for police officers and firefighters next year.

Indianapolis will use the first $21.7 million of its COIT revenue to pay for its emergency dispatchers and a local homestead tax credit next year. The rest is divided among the city, which gets 88 percent of the money (most going to public safety); townships, which get 8 percent; and excluded cities such as Beech Grove and Speedway, which get 3 percent.

Based on how Day’s law is written, the library’s share could cut into any of those sources or a combination.

City Controller David Reynolds said that, because of the tight city budget, state lawmakers should give local policymakers room to decide how local money is spent.

While he’s not in favor of the kind of directive Day plans to propose, he would support the Legislature’s giving the council the option of providing the libraries with COIT. Under current law, Reynolds said, the council could set aside a grant to give the libraries more local money but can’t directly channel the city’s COIT share toward libraries.

“I don’t think it’s the General Assembly’s decision to determine how we spend our money,” Reynolds said. “Mandating that dollars have to go to the libraries isn’t giving the flexibility that I think locals need.”

Some state lawmakers have similar reservations. Phil Hinkle, R-Indianapolis, worries it could set a precedent.

“The minute we take some of that local control,” Hinkle said, “we have to look at whether other entities that are not getting their fair share also want their fair share.”

Building a case

Library advocates, however, point out that Marion County libraries’ lack of COIT funding is unique.

Statewide, all library districts in counties that have a COIT or a similar County Adjusted Gross Income Tax receive a portion of that tax, except for Marion County’s districts. That amounts to 213 of the state’s 238 library districts, said Jim Corridan, deputy director of the Indiana State Library.

Day hopes that statistic will strengthen the argument for his bill next year, but he knows that—in addition to the early opposition—there will be hurdles to getting it passed.

He faces re-election this fall, but as a Democrat is expected to fare well in his district representing part of downtown and the city’s east side.

A more likely risk is that his party would lose control of the Indiana House of Representatives, which would make it tougher for his bill to get a hearing.

But Day remains undeterred. He already has started searching for a Republican to co-sponsor his legislation.

And even if he can’t get it passed, he said he hopes the effort will draw attention to the debate and possibly spur more action at a local level.

“I think this is very serious,” Day said. “The life and well-being of libraries are at stake.”•


  • Uh...Uh...Uh...
    @Frank Abagnale "Catch me if you can"


    An educated poster would know to use "buddies" instead of "buddys".

    In terms of diverting taxpayer revenue, look at the controversy re: should there be state-level income taxes?

    Gates & Gates (William Henry Gates III & Dad) are drafting legislation to force the state of Washington to have a state income tax. And there's a line ready to deal with them, hammer & tong.

    So: is it a good thing to have state income taxes?
  • Libraries are not important because...
    apparently, for most people, it's more essential to spend public dollars to glorify over-paid modern day gladiators for entertainment than it is to improve ordinary citizens to be more literate and better-educated.
  • TIF $
    This city thinks it is okay to use 8 million in TIF dollars for the ICVA, give the Pacers another 10 million per year and build a stadium with a 70 million+ dollar roof that we don't open but libraries get zilch!
  • priorities...
    God forbid the state just take a stand, have some integrity and give the library some money for the sake of intellectualism. Stop playacting to hillbillies who think budget cuts are going to solve the worlds problems.
  • Uh....
    C'mon you have Mayor Marine, Brizzi Protege -Ryan Vaughn and the Nefarious Vane who are running a Banana Republic taking care of all their buddys with contracts.

    The above Mafioso thinks that libraries are as useful as Drive-In theatres...

    An uneducated society will allow the Marine Marine thugs to continue their theft of taxpayer assets and hijack taxpayer revenue for their brown noser buddies projects.
  • The libraries are not important?
    Why do so many people think the libraries are not all that important?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.