IBJNews

Allison Transmission workers approve labor contracts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

About 1,550 of Allison Transmission Inc.’s Indianapolis hourly workers have ratified new five-year labor contracts, the locally-based automotive supplier announced Thursday.

The collective bargaining agreement for United Auto Workers Local 933 members goes into effect Monday and includes $5,000 signing bonuses.

The company and the union reached a tentative agreement on Nov. 16 that prevented a possible strike.

Allison said it will maintain a two-tiered pay system in the new collective bargaining agreement.

The more experienced tier-one and skilled tier-two workers will receive lump-sum payments totaling 3 percent of their annual wages each year from 2013 to 2016.

Production workers in tier two will receive base wage increases between 2 percent and 4 percent in 2013, 2015 and 2016. The workers will receive a one-time 3-percent lump sum payment in 2014.

The company has stopped basing its cost-of-living adjustments on a variable consumer price index. Instead, workers will receive a fixed annual payment of $1,000, it said.

Pension rates will not change for workers eligible for the retirement packages.

Tier-two employees, who have 401(k) plans, will receive 6-percent corporate matches, which is an increase from 5 percent in the previous contract.

Retirees’ health care benefits will be more like benefits offered by the Voluntary Employee Benefit Association that UAW retirees at Detroit’s Big Three automakers receive.

UAW Local 933 officers did not immediately respond Thursday morning to a message seeking comment on the contracts.

Allison stock rose 16 cents Thursday morning, to $21.12 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT