IBJNews

Amerigroup delays vote on $4.9B WellPoint acquisition

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Amerigroup Corp. officials agreed to delay a shareholder vote on WellPoint Inc.’s $4.9 billion buyout offer for the managed-care company to resolve investors’ claims they were being shortchanged in the deal, the company said in a securities filing.

Amerigroup will delay the company’s Oct. 9 annual meeting for two weeks and be willing to “receive and consider in good faith any inquiries and superior proposals” to WellPoint’s offer, officials said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday.

The settlement comes more than a month after Angela Braly, Wellpoint’s embattled chairman and CEO, stepped down in the face of shareholder criticism over the health insurer’s performance. John Cannon, WellPoint’s general counsel, is serving as interim CEO while the company searches for a replacement.

Braly, 51, took over the CEO position in June 2007. During her tenure, she became a high-profile foe of President Barack Obama’s health-care overhaul and, more recently, sparked the ire of investors after WellPoint missed earnings estimates and cut its forecast twice in four months.

Maureen McDonald, an Amerigroup spokeswoman, declined in an e-mailed statement to comment beyond the SEC filing on the settlement of investors’ claims. Kristin Bins, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis-based WellPoint, didn’t immediately return a call for comment.

The acquisition, announced July 9, would make WellPoint, the second-largest U.S. health insurer, the largest private provider of Medicaid plans for low-income patients. Amerigroup helps states manage health coverage for the poor.

Amerigroup investors sued the insurer’s board in August alleging directors, along with financial adviser Goldman Sachs Group Inc., put their own interests ahead of shareholders by backing the WellPoint offer.

Goldman Sachs was “hopelessly conflicted” as an adviser on the transaction and pushed the board to ignore a more lucrative deal with a suitor described as Company D, lawyers for the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and the City of Monroe Employees Retirement System in Michigan said in court filings.

While the funds weren’t able to win a financial recovery in the case, Amerigroup and WellPoint officials agreed to cut the so-called breakup fee in the deal by $49 million, according to the SEC filing. That means Amerigroup would have to pay $97 million if WellPoint’s bid is topped instead of $146 million.

Amerigroup and WellPoint officials denied any wrongdoing in connection with the buyout and agreed to the settlement to “avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation,” according to the filing.

Delaware Chief Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine still must decide whether to approve the settlement before it becomes final.

Virginia Beach, Virginia-based Amerigroup on Monday said it would sell its operations in that state to Inova, a not-for-profit health-care system after antitrust questions from the U.S. Justice Department arose on the pending Wellpoint sale.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is a big help. Thanks for share it here.

  2. Doug Henning!

  3. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  4. Magician and illusionist!

  5. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

ADVERTISEMENT