IBJNews

Angie's List accuses competitor of deceptive ads

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angie’s List Inc. alleges in a federal lawsuit that its trademarked name is being misused by a Colorado competitor to intercept people conducting Google searches for the Indianapolis-based contractor-ratings service.

The lawsuit filed June 1 in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis alleges Golden, Colo.-based ServiceMagic Inc. bought advertisements, known as sponsored links, “intended to deceive Angie’s List members and potential members.”

Angie’s List’s complaint includes a screen shot of a Google ad, running below its own ad, titled, “Angie’s List Chicago – Bids from ServiceMagic Contractors.”

Underneath is the link to www.servicemagic.com.

The suit cites another sponsored link that runs near the top of the Google results page titled:  “Why Pay for Her List? Our Service is Free.” 

“ServiceMagic profits from attempting to lure away home owners who otherwise use or would use Angie’s List’s website,” states the complaint. “Angie’s List believes it has lost members and/or potential members to ServiceMagic and  … has incurred and continues to incur unnecessary and excessive expenses to combat and mitigate the effects” of the alleged misconduct.

Angie’s List also alleges that ServiceMagic, in a comparison table on its website,  inflated the monthly cost of Angie’s List service in the Denver market—at $13.75 instead of the actual $3.25.

The complaint alleges trademark infringement, unfair competition, trade disparagement, trademark dilution and unjust enrichment.

Angie's List seeks unspecified monetary damages and an injunction to stop ServiceMagic’s ads.

ServiceMagic only recently became aware of the suit, said its spokeswoman, Brooke Gabbert.  “I can’t comment on the lawsuit since the litigation is pending,” she said.

There’s nothing illegal, per se, about purchasing ad words or about comparative advertising, said Marshall Leaffer, a scholar in intellectual property law at Indiana University’s Maurer School of Law.

But one issue is whether the use of the ad word causes confusion to consumers. “It’s how you use the ad word that’s critical,” said Leaffer.

Courts have generally held companies to the standard of whether a reasonably informed consumer can make distinctions and not be confused.  

Angie’s complaint makes several references to consumers being confused, saying ServiceMagic’s link “was intended to and likely to confuse members who saw the term ‘Angie’s List’ and quickly clicked on the link.”

But whether a court will buy such a claim is anybody’s guess. ServiceMagic’s web address is clearly visible below the sponsored ads’ headline.

The legal concept of “reasonably informed” consumer has changed over the past 20 years as newer forms of media emerge, such as advertising over the Internet.  Some rulings have recognized that “the Internet shopper is much more savvy,” Leaffer added.

Angie’s List, founded in 1995, has about 1.2 million paid members in 186 local markets.  It compiles ratings of contractors in hundreds of categories such as plumbers, automotive service and health care.  Members pay a subscription fee.

The company went public late last year and has been using proceeds on a television advertising blitz and to enter new markets.

ServiceMagic operates a website that connects consumers with 80,000 local service providers it says are screened and pre-approved.

The Colorado company claims nearly 4 million unique visitors to its website each month. Service Magic has purchased broadcast ads in the Indianapolis market.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Angie's List is a scam
    All business must pay Angie's list to be featured.....or they are forever buried. The reviews are far from real and the only operation the list wants is money from all sides. What a scam!
  • Extortion without representation
    It about time someone takes on the Angie's List deceptive practices of extortion of small business owners. They only take money from small business owners and create hope of sending them business. No advertisers can show a meaningful ROI on monies spent to advertise with Angie's List
  • Educate yourself
    The two posters above are terribly misinformed/uneducated on this topic!
    • The End
      Here comes the blame game! This always happens right before a company fails, the execs are finding excuses already. And right after all the insiders sold their shares......Typical Indiana white collar fraud - Been happening since Mitch Daniels took over
    • Angie's List
      Angie's list is a waste anyway. Who actually uses it? Companies place ads and I can bet there is no real return for 90% of the companies that have used Angie's list.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

    2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

    3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

    4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

    5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

    ADVERTISEMENT