IBJNews

Another day, another delay for Emmis going-private vote

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It's starting to feel like Groundhog Day over at Emmis Communications headquarters on Monument Circle.

The movie version, that is. Is Bill Murray available to play CEO Jeff Smulyan?

Smulyan delayed a shareholder vote Friday, for the eighth time overall and second time in 24 hours, on a proposed deal to take the company private.

He's trying to strike an agreement that's palatable for both a group of preferred shareholders and his financier, New York-based Alden Global Capital. The proposed deal would be worth about $90 million.

Most recently, the meeting was scheduled for Sept. 2, moved to Sept. 3, and now is slated for Sept. 8. But the ultimate deadline probably is Sept. 24, when the original financing deal between Alden and an entity controlled by Smulyan, announced in April, expires.

Emmis executives, including Chief Operating Officer Patrick M. Walsh, have said they are not optimistic the parties will be able to reach a deal.

"The parties are still talking, but we haven't made as much progress as we hoped and we think a deal is unlikely," Walsh said Friday morning.

Emmis shares rose about 3 percent in early trading, to $1.64 each, on news of another delay. The shares remain more than 30 percent below Smulyan's tender offer of $2.40 per share, factoring in the risk the deal will fall through.

Walsh said Indianapolis-based Emmis is "bouncing back" from the recession and slowdown across the media industry, and will be working to "build on that momentum" whether it remains a public company or goes private.

Emmis announced Monday morning that Alden had backed out of an “agreement in principle” to sweeten the terms for the preferred shareholders. That move rendered the entire deal “unlikely” to happen, the company said.

Emmis’ stock swooned on the news, falling by nearly 27 percent at one point Tuesday. The shares bounced back a bit Thursday to close at $1.59.

“Investors are betting against the deal being revived,” wrote Tom Taylor, news editor of the industry publication Radio-Info.com, on Tuesday. He noted that talks are ongoing but added, “It may be too late to save the deal.”

Company officials were more hopeful Thursday night, delaying the meeting by less than 24 hours.

Smulyan and Alden agreed in April to take Emmis private. But, in July, nine dissident investors emerged to block the deal. They collectively hold 38 percent of the preferred shares—more than enough to prevent Smulyan from securing the necessary two-thirds vote required to approve his plan.

The dissidents balked at Smulyan’s initial offer to convert their shares into bonds worth only 60 percent of the value of the shares, but paying an interest rate nearly double the 6.25 percent the shareholders currently enjoy.

Smulyan’s proposal also requires approval from the holders of a majority of Emmis shares, a threshold he already has the votes to meet.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Indianapolis-based Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in seven cities, including Indianapolis Monthly

This is not the first time Smulyan—the company's controlling shareholder—has tried to take Emmis private. Smulyan made an offer in May 2006 to acquire all the shares of Emmis for $15.25 per share in a deal that valued the company’s stock at $567 million.

He called off the deal a few months later after he couldn’t reach terms with the board. The company later declared a special $4-per-share dividend.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Enough of Emmis as "news"
    Well at least we are saved from another Friday evening "Breaking News" story. This ceased to be of interested after the 3rd delay (or before in my case).

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT