Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra musicians’ contract negotiations remain stalled and another week of concerts has been
canceled after a Saturday deadline passed with no resolution.
ISO executives and American Federation of Musicians Local 3 negotiators have agreed to many of the financial details in a
potential five-year agreement that management announced last week, but they're stuck on a clause that would allow early
contract termination.
Musicians had until Saturday evening to decide on the offer.
As part of an agreement in principle, musicians would accept a 32-percent pay cut in the first year of the pact. Starting
salaries would drop from $78,000 to $53,000. Pay then would increase every year, reaching $70,000 in year five.
At issue is a management-proposed clause that would allow either side to cancel the contract after the third year.
Use of the clause hinges on the ISO’s ability to boost its fundraising by millions of dollars every year.
The organization usually takes in about $6.5 million every year through its governing body, the Indiana Symphony Society,
and a separate arm that manages its endowment, the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra Foundation.
ISO leaders last week outlined much more aggressive fundraising goals: $9.8 million in the contract’s
first year, $9.7 million the second year, $11 million the third year, $11.7 million the fourth year, and $12.6 the fifth year.
If the symphony collects $5 million by March 31, 2013, management said it will remove the escape clause from the contract.
“The board [of directors] has indicated a steep commitment to step up and find tens of millions of dollars to support
the cost of operations over the course of the five years encompassed by the latest offer," board Chairman John Thornburgh
said in a prepared statement. "But it only felt comfortable committing to the full extent of it if it could secure an
initial showing of support from the community that they were willing to partner with the symphony.
“We all know the symphony is there. We only seek to harness that passion and ensure at least an initial showing of
dollars will be there, too.”
The musicians' union is worried management will exercise the out clause, regardless of fundraising results, to terminate
the contract before restoring pay to the proposed year-five level, lead negotiator Richard Graef said last week. Starting
pay at year three would be $60,000.
Management locked out musicians on Sept. 8, saying the organization could no longer afford its 2009 contract, which expired
Sept. 2.
The group has canceled five shows so far this season because of the work stoppage.
Stock market-induced financial woes—encountered at orchestras throughout the U.S.—have pressed the group into
significant cutbacks and business model restructuring after the investment-based endowment shriveled from a peak of $120 million.
Management has repeatedly pointed to a struggling endowment, which stood at $80 million at the end of its previous fiscal
year on Aug. 31.
A year earlier, the fund was $89 million. After accounting for stock gains, the ISO drew down about 13 percent of its balance,
exceeding the 5 percent spending rate experts generally believe is sustainable.
Orchestra expenses represented about 45 percent of the roughly $26 million ISO spent in fiscal 2011. Concert production was
another 19 percent.
The musicians argue that cutting into the orchestra’s core product would chase off talent and ultimately ruin the ISO.

















So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.
Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?
So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.
Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.
RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.