IBJNews

Veolia appeals regulators' rate-hike decision

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Veolia Water Indianapolis, which manages the city’s water utility, has appealed an order issued by state utility regulators that limited a major rate increase sought by the city.

In a filing with the Indiana Court of Appeals, French-owned Veolia said it has been “adversely affected” by the June 30 emergency rate order of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission granting a 12.3-percent rate increase--far less than the 17.5-percent hike requested by the city’s Department of Water Works.

The city sought the emergency rate hike after a variable-rate bond financing soured, boosting the water utility’s debt obligations by about $26 million annually.

In its appeal, Veolia cites a portion of the IURC’s emergency-rate order requiring the city to hold at 2008 levels management fees paid to Veolia. The city had planned on a 5-percent increase in fees to Veolia.

According to commission records, Veolia is paid fees representing about 80 percent of the water department’s annual operation and maintenance expenses, which total $63.2 million.

Veolia also noted in its appeal that the commission ordered the city not to pay $1.7 million in additional payments owed Veolia under the management agreement, pending further review.

The IURC had previously pressed city officials as to why they had not attempted to renegotiate management fees paid to Veolia, given the water department’s financial problems.

City officials testified during the rate case that Veolia would likely argue it was not responsible for the city’s decisions to refinance its bond debt, which blew up when financial markets collapsed late last year.

In 2005, in what looked like a smart way to free up $45 million in extra cash for capital projects, the department, through the Indianapolis Bond Bank, refinanced fixed-rate bonds into variable-rate bonds with such abandon that, today, variable debt amounts to nearly 60 percent of its $845 million in outstanding bonds.

Bond swaps intended to mitigate the risk of interest-rate variations failed to backstop the risk as financial firms involved in the deal saw their credit ratings plunge.

Neither Veolia nor its attorneys could be reached for comment this morning regarding the appeal, which was filed July 30.

The city said it also intends to file for a general rate increase next year to cover costs of system upgrades and service extensions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT