IBJNews

State appeals injunction blocking abortion law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's attorney general on Tuesday appealed a judge's ruling that blocked key aspects of a new state law that cut some public funding for Planned Parenthood because the organization provides abortions.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, a move that was expected after U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt issued a preliminary injunction last week blocking parts of the law.

The injunction was granted as part of a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood of Indiana. The state will submit the legal basis for its appeal later, but in its failed attempt to block the injunction, it argued that a separate challenge to the law was the proper forum to determine its legality, not Planned Parenthood's challenge.

In that case, the state is appealing Medicaid Administrator Donald Berwick's June 1 decision rejecting changes to Indiana's Medicaid plan brought on by the new law. Berwick contended that Medicaid recipients have the right to obtain treatment from any qualified provider, including those that provide abortions. The state filed that appeal with Berwick's office on Thursday, and if the two sides can't work out a compromise, that dispute would also likely land before the appeals court in Chicago, Zoeller told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

"There is this process between the federal and state governments which is the proper process by which these things are resolved," Zoeller said.

Indiana's appeal seeks a review of the preliminary injunction before any further action is taken on Planned Parenthood's lawsuit, which seeks a permanent injunction against the law. The injunction Pratt issued Friday would remain in effect while the appeal is pending.

When Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels signed the law May 10, it immediately cut off about $1.4 million to Planned Parenthood and made Indiana the first state to deny the organization Medicaid funds for general health services, including cancer screenings. The law's other provisions are set to take effect July 1, but Pratt also issued a preliminary injunction blocking one of those — a requirement that doctors providing abortions inform their patients that a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks of gestation or sooner.

Planned Parenthood, which serves about 9,300 Indiana clients on the state-federal health insurance plan for low-income and disabled people, went without Medicaid funding after the law took effect but continued seeing Medicaid patients until last week, when private donations that paid those patients' bills ran out. It resumed seeing Medicaid patients after Pratt ruled.

"We are confident we will prevail in our legal arguments and find it regrettable that the Indiana Attorney General has chosen to invest even more state resources in an appeal," Betty Cockrum, the head of Planned Parenthood of Indiana, said in a statement.

The state has argued that Medicaid, even though it does not fund abortions in most cases, indirectly subsidizes the procedures at Planned Parenthood because the organization's financial statements show it commingles Medicaid funds with other revenues, and the public money might pay some of the overhead costs for space where abortions are performed. Planned Parenthood conducts more than 5,000 abortions a year in Indiana.

Pratt noted in her ruling that the administration of President Barack Obama had threatened to withhold some or all of Indiana's Medicaid funds because of the new law, which could total more than $5 billion annually and affect nearly 1 million residents. A federal Medicaid bulletin issued the same day as Berwick's decision rejecting the Indiana changes said states cannot exclude qualified health care providers merely because they also provide abortions.

"Thus, denying the injunction could pit the federal government against the State of Indiana in a high-stakes political impasse," the judge wrote. "And if dogma trumps pragmatism and neither side budges, Indiana's most vulnerable citizens could end up paying the price as the collateral damage of a partisan battle."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Attorney General Greg Zoeller
    GO GO GO Attorney General Greg Zoeller!!!!!!! As a Democrat in Indiana who is totally against waste of my tax dollars this is the best possible action for your office to take! Everyone in Indiana is so over this business abusing our tax money and if it takes cutting every single bit of the Medicaid money well I say do it! The fascist in Washington have no idea what Hoosiers need so it is up to people like you and your office to make a stand for all of us! A lot of us voted off our party this time because we are sick of the waste and we believe that know matter how liberal someone thinks you are we are ALL HOOSIERS! You see this thru knowing it is the right thing for Indiana!!
  • planned parenthood
    I"m glad elections are coming up,so we can vote these self-rightous,politians out of office.Why would you want,to deny,any money for medicare,for any reason.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT