Dr. Richard Feldman: How health care bills fared this legislative session
Indeed, the session proved to be the lightest and most inconsequential in my memory.
Indeed, the session proved to be the lightest and most inconsequential in my memory.
Corporatization wouldn’t be necessarily bad if it operated on the highest ethical and moral ground. But it doesn’t.
Denials can also result in cost shifting to patients.
These diseases account for tens of thousands of hospitalizations and deaths yearly.
The prescription medications used are self-administered; this is not euthanasia.
At least 30% of depression is treatment-resistant and something I clinically see routinely.
These brain waves are now recognized markers of lucid consciousness in the dying process.
Kennedy is a purveyor of fringe science that extends outrageously beyond vaccine-related issues.
My best counsel is to limit sugar consumption, especially sugary drinks.
In 2020, 50% of maternal deaths were of women who did not receive early prenatal care, and 15% did not receive any care.
Cancer mortality risk increased 10% for one additional daily serving of red meat.
Senate Bill 4 … infuses $225 million over the biennium for local health department infrastructure and provision of health programs.
Unplanned/unintended pregnancies are related to increased maternal and infant mortality.
Confusion is prevalent because disclosure of the type of health professional performing the service is not always clear.
Physicians value their APRN colleagues but have long believed they should be part of a health care team led by a physician.
If legalization is unfeasible, at least decriminalize marijuana.
It is well known from multiple authoritative sources that increasing the cigarette tax is probably the most effective single strategy for reducing smoking rates.
The commission issued a good report, but it contains nothing really innovative or cutting-edge; Indiana is not ready for that.
Public debate is increasingly driven by what people want or expediently claim to be true rather than what is verifiably true.
Non-physicians … will second-guess and challenge physicians who are acting in a responsible, evidenced-based, good-faith manner.