BASILE: PBS film could return national parks to national discourse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Frank Basile

One of the best things our government ever did was to set aside land for national parks and to keep each in pristine condition while making them accessible for people to visit. Each is different and has its own unique setting and breathtaking beauty.

To date, my wife Katrina and I have visited 36 of the 58 of them.

Apparently, we’re not their only fans, as is made clear in Ken Burns’ documentary film for PBS titled “The National Parks, America’s Best Idea,” which recently premiered on PBS (more information at www.pbs.org/nationalparks). The title came from writer Wallace Stegner, who called the national parks "the best idea we ever had." No activity of the federal government engenders such universal support and public loyalty.

As with other places of interest to Katrina and me, such as presidential libraries, world heritage sites, other countries and Frank Lloyd Wright buildings, we maintain a list of the parks and visit them as we travel to other places or, in some cases, we plan the trip around visiting one or more of them.

Besides the obvious benefit of keeping track of where we have been and where we plan to visit, maintaining a checklist has the side benefit of providing a sense of accomplishment as each one visited is checked off. But the primary benefit is the fun of visiting, seeing and experiencing places that are of interest to us.

It’s difficult to say which is our favorite national park. Like traveling in general, we feel the place we just visited was the best, which is probably a good thing. When I am researching the next park or other place we are going to visit, I start thinking my favorite is the next one! So the answer is that we liked them all.

Arches National Park in Utah features more than 2,000 natural sandstone arches. (Photo/Frank Basile)

I’m not sure what Burns would answer, but pressed in a recent USA Weekend article to name the “10 National Parks You Wouldn’t Want to Miss,” he listed Yosemite, Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Denali, Glacier, Great Smoky Mountains (which is the most visited of the national parks), Acadia (first national park east of the Mississippi), Everglades, Zion and Shenandoah. We have seen all but Denali on this list and it is hard to argue with his selection.

Other than those listed by Burns, our favorites include Crater Lake National Park in Oregon. The national parks Web site describes the park as follows: “Crater Lake has inspired people for hundreds of years. No place else on earth combines a deep, pure lake, so blue in color; sheer surrounding cliffs, almost 2,000 feet high; two picturesque islands; and a violent volcanic past. It is a place of immeasurable beauty, and an outstanding outdoor laboratory and classroom.” Our first view of Crater Lake was at sunrise and to say it was like a spiritual experience is not an exaggeration.

Another favorite on our list would include Big Bend National Park in southwest Texas, where you can so clearly see thousands of stars at night while in the vicinity of a mountain, desert and the Rio Grande River. It’s a place of magnificent beauty.

We had Thanksgiving dinner in the Inn in Sequoia National Park in 2005 and were mesmerized by the stunning scenery as we dined in the glass-enclosed dining room overlooking a section of the park. It’s adjacent to Kings Canyon National Park in the southern Sierra Nevada, east of the San Joaquin Valley. The Web site describes these two parks as follows: This landscape testifies to nature’s size, beauty and diversity – huge mountains, rugged foothills, deep canyons, vast caverns and the world’s largest trees!

Our list would include Arches National Park in Utah. It’s Web site says: “It preserves over 2,000 natural sandstone arches, like the world-famous Delicate Arch, as well as many other unusual rock formations. In some areas, the forces of nature have exposed millions of years of geologic history. The extraordinary features of the park create a landscape of contrasting colors, landforms and textures that is unlike any other in the world.”

Mesa Verde National Park would be on our list. “It offers a spectacular look into the lives of the ancestral Pueblo people who made it their home for over 700 years, from A.D. 600 to A.D. 1300,” the park’s Web site reports. “Today, the park protects over 4,000 known archeological sites, including 600 cliff dwellings. These sites are some of the most notable and best-preserved in the United States.”

The final favorite is Rocky Mountains National Park. The park Web site describes it: “From lush valleys to craggy peaks, this living showcase of the grandeur of the Rocky Mountains, with elevations ranging from 8,000 feet in the wet, grassy valleys to 14,259 feet at the weather-ravaged top of Longs Peak, provides visitors with opportunities for countless breathtaking experiences and adventures.”

For further research into the national parks prior to your visit, the official Web site is http://www.nps.gov.•


Basile is an author, professional speaker, philanthropist, community volunteer and retired executive of Gene B. Glick Co. His column appears occasionally. Basile can be reached at Frank_Basile@sbcglobal.net.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!