IBJNews

Beck's Superior Hybrids plans $24.5M expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint


A Hamilton County seed company has plans to expand its facilities, creating as many as 72 jobs over the next five years, state economic development officials said Friday morning.

Beck's Superior Hybrids will invest more than $24.5 million to ramp up its research, production, processing and logistics operations.

The company now has more than 175 employees in Atlanta, Ind., producing and selling seed corn, soybeans, wheat, alfalfa and forages to farmers throughout the Midwest. Beck’s plans to hire 15-20 workers by the end of this year and will add staff as additional facilities come on line.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered the company as much as $650,000 in performance-based tax credits based on its job-creation plans. Hamilton County will provide additional property tax abatement.

"Working with the IEDC has been a very positive factor in keeping our expansion plans here in Indiana," Sonny Beck, president of Beck's Superior Hybrids, said in a prepared statement.

Founded in 1937, the company is in its fourth generation of family management. Beck's operates out of eight locations in Indiana and Illinois, including some it uses under contract with other businesses.
.
Indiana is home to more than 61,000 farms on 14.8 million acres of land, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 2009 Agriculture Overview.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Great news!
    Good news for a great company! Beck's is a real gem for this state.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Back in my teens/early 20s, Chicago's in Greenfield was a spot where my friends and I ate on a constant basis. Chicago's has always offered good pizza and bread sticks, but after getting married and buying a home, their prices and locations have made it so I would only get their pizza once every three years. They have expanded into McCordsville, but sadly closed the downtown Indy store years ago (this was the coolest layout for a restaurant in my opinion).

    Just recently we decided to try Chicago's at the old Greenfield location. While it was clean, they haven't updated much over the last five years or so. Still the same layout, booths, tables, etc.. I made a comment to my wife about how that place hasn't changed in years. Good to see they are doing well enough to build a newer building.

  2. INDIANA CASINOS ARE TIGHT. OTHER OUTSIDE CASINOS HAVE WINNERS ALL DAY LONG. PEOPLE HIT REGULARLY AT OUTSIDE CASINOS, INDIANA CASINOS HAVE FEW WINNERS ESPECIALLY THE LARGER JACKPOT WINNERS. PEOPLE ARE NOT WINNING ENOUGH AT INDIANA CASINO , SO THEY ARE NOT FUN TO VISIT. I,D RATHER TRAVEL TO OUTSIDE CASINO AND TAKE THE CHANCE ON WINNING AND HAVING FUN DOING THAT , THEN TO KNOW THAT YOUR CHANCES AT WINNING AT A INDIANA CASINO AREFAR AND IN BETWEEN.

  3. record low crowd and a record low TV audience.

  4. for an IRL carb day. Like a record tv number,,,,that would be soooo hard

  5. For those of you who think the state didn't do as much as they should...the state did $6M more than they should!!! As a taxpayer I am opposed to the $6M!!!

ADVERTISEMENT