Bill seeks to boost investment credit, startups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Potential investors in Indiana startups may be even more inclined to take the financial leap if a Republican-backed bill clears both chambers of the Legislature.

Rep. Jerry Torr, R-Carmel, introduced House Bill 1008, which would increase the maximum venture capital tax credits from $500,000 to $1 million, suspend the application fee and simplify the application process. On Wednesday the legislation was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development.

In introducing the bill, Torr argued that the state’s current budget constraints limit the General Assembly’s ability to provide funds for economic development.

Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob is squarely behind the measure. He mentioned Indianapolis-based Angie’s List, ExactTarget and Scale Computing as among the scores of companies that have attracted out-of-state investments.

“Quite candidly, our preference is that the money come[s] from Indiana,” he said. “And the reason for that is those [out-of-state] investors occasionally want to move those companies outside Indiana.”
Since the inception of the state’s Venture Capital Investment Tax Credit in late 2003, a total of 208 companies have taken advantage of the incentive to raise $138.4 million in private capital. Of those, 20 companies have reached the maximum award amount of $500,000 in tax credits.

Indiana doles out the tax credits to promising companies, which in turn dangle them in front of potential investors as a way of sweetening the pot. The incentive is meant to entice speculators to gamble on unproven high-tech ventures they’d otherwise pass over in favor of more certain bets.

Allowing investors to write off 20 percent of a $2.5 million investment on their state taxes has proven to be a nice motivation, said Bruce Kidd, senior vice president of Indianapolis-based Walker Information and a former director of small business and entrepreneurship at the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

But increasing the credit to $1 million, which would push the maximum investment to $5 million, is even better, Kidd argued.

“There were several times when a particular company hit $500,000 of credits,” he said. “Frankly, that wasn’t really enough for some of these early-stage, but high-potential companies that were raising millions of dollars. It really is a catalyst for larger investments.”

To receive the tax credits, young companies apply to the IEDC for certification. If deemed sufficiently innovative, they receive tax credit vouchers. Then, during fundraising, companies pass the vouchers along to their investors, who claim the credits.

Raising the credit to $1 million now only will benefit a small percentage of companies, because most aren’t raising $5 million in this economy, Kidd said. Those that do typically are life sciences firms that need more startup capital than, say, software companies.

Even so, those that take a chunk of the credit now can always come back for more if the amount of the credit is raised, he said.

“This isn’t cash, this is deferring taxes, if you will,” Kidd said. “So it’s taking away some revenue from a tax base, but the upside is far greater because it’s a non-cash credit.”

Roob is hopeful the bill will pass and is galvanized by the Republicans’ majority in both the House and Senate.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing