IBJNews

Bill seeks to boost investment credit, startups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Potential investors in Indiana startups may be even more inclined to take the financial leap if a Republican-backed bill clears both chambers of the Legislature.

Rep. Jerry Torr, R-Carmel, introduced House Bill 1008, which would increase the maximum venture capital tax credits from $500,000 to $1 million, suspend the application fee and simplify the application process. On Wednesday the legislation was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development.

In introducing the bill, Torr argued that the state’s current budget constraints limit the General Assembly’s ability to provide funds for economic development.

Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob is squarely behind the measure. He mentioned Indianapolis-based Angie’s List, ExactTarget and Scale Computing as among the scores of companies that have attracted out-of-state investments.

“Quite candidly, our preference is that the money come[s] from Indiana,” he said. “And the reason for that is those [out-of-state] investors occasionally want to move those companies outside Indiana.”
   
Since the inception of the state’s Venture Capital Investment Tax Credit in late 2003, a total of 208 companies have taken advantage of the incentive to raise $138.4 million in private capital. Of those, 20 companies have reached the maximum award amount of $500,000 in tax credits.

Indiana doles out the tax credits to promising companies, which in turn dangle them in front of potential investors as a way of sweetening the pot. The incentive is meant to entice speculators to gamble on unproven high-tech ventures they’d otherwise pass over in favor of more certain bets.

Allowing investors to write off 20 percent of a $2.5 million investment on their state taxes has proven to be a nice motivation, said Bruce Kidd, senior vice president of Indianapolis-based Walker Information and a former director of small business and entrepreneurship at the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

But increasing the credit to $1 million, which would push the maximum investment to $5 million, is even better, Kidd argued.

“There were several times when a particular company hit $500,000 of credits,” he said. “Frankly, that wasn’t really enough for some of these early-stage, but high-potential companies that were raising millions of dollars. It really is a catalyst for larger investments.”

To receive the tax credits, young companies apply to the IEDC for certification. If deemed sufficiently innovative, they receive tax credit vouchers. Then, during fundraising, companies pass the vouchers along to their investors, who claim the credits.

Raising the credit to $1 million now only will benefit a small percentage of companies, because most aren’t raising $5 million in this economy, Kidd said. Those that do typically are life sciences firms that need more startup capital than, say, software companies.

Even so, those that take a chunk of the credit now can always come back for more if the amount of the credit is raised, he said.

“This isn’t cash, this is deferring taxes, if you will,” Kidd said. “So it’s taking away some revenue from a tax base, but the upside is far greater because it’s a non-cash credit.”

Roob is hopeful the bill will pass and is galvanized by the Republicans’ majority in both the House and Senate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT