IBJNews

Bill seeks to boost investment credit, startups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Potential investors in Indiana startups may be even more inclined to take the financial leap if a Republican-backed bill clears both chambers of the Legislature.

Rep. Jerry Torr, R-Carmel, introduced House Bill 1008, which would increase the maximum venture capital tax credits from $500,000 to $1 million, suspend the application fee and simplify the application process. On Wednesday the legislation was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development.

In introducing the bill, Torr argued that the state’s current budget constraints limit the General Assembly’s ability to provide funds for economic development.

Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob is squarely behind the measure. He mentioned Indianapolis-based Angie’s List, ExactTarget and Scale Computing as among the scores of companies that have attracted out-of-state investments.

“Quite candidly, our preference is that the money come[s] from Indiana,” he said. “And the reason for that is those [out-of-state] investors occasionally want to move those companies outside Indiana.”
   
Since the inception of the state’s Venture Capital Investment Tax Credit in late 2003, a total of 208 companies have taken advantage of the incentive to raise $138.4 million in private capital. Of those, 20 companies have reached the maximum award amount of $500,000 in tax credits.

Indiana doles out the tax credits to promising companies, which in turn dangle them in front of potential investors as a way of sweetening the pot. The incentive is meant to entice speculators to gamble on unproven high-tech ventures they’d otherwise pass over in favor of more certain bets.

Allowing investors to write off 20 percent of a $2.5 million investment on their state taxes has proven to be a nice motivation, said Bruce Kidd, senior vice president of Indianapolis-based Walker Information and a former director of small business and entrepreneurship at the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

But increasing the credit to $1 million, which would push the maximum investment to $5 million, is even better, Kidd argued.

“There were several times when a particular company hit $500,000 of credits,” he said. “Frankly, that wasn’t really enough for some of these early-stage, but high-potential companies that were raising millions of dollars. It really is a catalyst for larger investments.”

To receive the tax credits, young companies apply to the IEDC for certification. If deemed sufficiently innovative, they receive tax credit vouchers. Then, during fundraising, companies pass the vouchers along to their investors, who claim the credits.

Raising the credit to $1 million now only will benefit a small percentage of companies, because most aren’t raising $5 million in this economy, Kidd said. Those that do typically are life sciences firms that need more startup capital than, say, software companies.

Even so, those that take a chunk of the credit now can always come back for more if the amount of the credit is raised, he said.

“This isn’t cash, this is deferring taxes, if you will,” Kidd said. “So it’s taking away some revenue from a tax base, but the upside is far greater because it’s a non-cash credit.”

Roob is hopeful the bill will pass and is galvanized by the Republicans’ majority in both the House and Senate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT