Bill to excuse students for state fair heads to governor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A bill to help students participate in the Indiana State Fair passed the Senate and is now on its way to Gov. Mike Pence to sign into law or veto.

Senate Bill 114 would let students have up to five excused absences from school to participate in the fair. The legislation results from the increased number of schools using balanced or year-round calendars, which means more students are in class during the summer fair.

The bill had previously passed the Senate but was amended before passage in the House.

The House added language that the bill’s author, Sen. Jean Leising-R, Oldenburg, said makes it a “better bill.”

The new provision says parents must ask for the excused absence in writing and the principal must grant the absence in writing if the student is in good academic standing.

Another House change increased the number of allowed absences from three days to five days.

However, Sen. Earline Rogers, D-Gary, said she is not thrilled with the House changes. She said she does not feel the state fair rises to the same level as serving as a page or volunteering on Election Day, which are other absences allowed by law.

“I think they’ve made a bad deal worse,” Rogers said.


  • School in August In IN
    In D.C. and in some eastern states, school goes in to June and is not held in July and August. For a state that wants to move forward, IN is totally backward on the school calendars. This needs to be legislated, as the districts can move ISTEP, etc. back to accommodate a later start and finish to the calendar year.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.