IBJNews

Bill would expand state’s historic preservation tax credit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A bill that was killed last year after passing the Indiana House has been revived this session in hopes of expanding the state’s historic preservation tax credit.

Rep. Ed Clere, R-New Albany, said the bill is all about economic and job development.

He said Indiana has too many historic buildings left abandoned that could be renovated into something useful. That’s why Indiana Landmarks — a not-for-profit preservation group — supports the bill.

The organization’s lobbyist, Amy Levander, also said that sometimes renovating just one historic building can have a positive effect on an entire town.

“This ranges from our smallest towns to our largest cities,” Clere said. “Every town has these buildings and this is a bill that offers something for every community.”

Marsh Davis, president of Indiana Landmarks, has said while Indiana is one of about 30 states that has a historical preservation tax credit, Indiana’s cap is one of the lowest.

“It is the least effective of all the 30-some programs in the country like it,” Davis said last year, during an earlier debate about the legislation. “And the reason is the annual allocation cap is very low. I mean most states that have caps at all are in the tens of millions, if not more.”

According to Indiana Landmarks, tax credits work in the following way: 20 percent of what a property owner spends to rehabilitate a historic, income-producing property comes off the bottom line of the taxes paid to the state and federal governments. There are restrictions and guidelines that limit the type of buildings and renovations the tax credit program covers.

Currently, the credit is backlogged because the tax credit caps at $450,000 per year. That means some projects approved for the program have been completed but can’t claim the tax credit for at least a dozen years. Supporters of  a program expansion say that gives few incentives for investors to restore historic properties, especially since many of them are private developers.

“I have talked to developers around the state who can be just an individual who has an interest in their town,” Levander said.

Last year, the House approved a bill to significantly expand the program. But the Senate changed it so dramatically that Clere, the author, killed the bill.

This year, a House committee amended similar language into a Senate bill. “I’m excited we’ve found a new home for the language of the bill,” Clere said.

The new bill — Senate Bill 4 — is now headed to the Ways and Means Committee, where it is expected to be considered next week.  The bill would increase the current $450,000 annual cap on tax credits to $2 million the first year and increase the cap gradually to $10 million by 2017.

“We’re trying to increase the annual cap and revise and update a number of other features to make it more functional and useful,” Clere said.

Most of the money would be used for projects approved after June 30. The bill would assign $450,000 per year in funding to take care of the backlog of credits.

Clere said he has no intention of giving up on the bill if it doesn’t pass this session. “One way or another we’re going to make this happen,” he said. “It’s just too important for Indiana to let it die.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Preservation is Key
    Fort Harrison on Indy's NE side is a perfect example of what historic preservation is all about and it continues to thrive. Mass Ave was a bunch of old empty buildings several years ago and look at that area now !!! The old buildings provide a sense of history, stability and community.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT