IBJNews

Calumet jumps into $300 million refinery joint venture

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Calumet Specialty Products Partners LP plans to build a $300 million diesel refinery in North Dakota as part of a joint venture with energy company MDU Resources Group Inc., the firms announced after markets closed Thursday.

Indianapolis-based Calumet will contribute $75 million to the project and receive half the profit from the operation, which is slated to open in late 2014 in Dickinson, N.D.

MDU, which will run its share of the plant through subsidiary WBI Energy Inc., will put $150 million into the refinery.

The remaining $75 million will come from a loan to the joint venture, which will operate as the Dakota Prairie Refining LLC.

Calumet and MDU estimate the refinery will employ 100 people and process 20,000 barrels of crude oil per day.

MDU will provide some of the crude, as well as the natural gas and electricity utilities. Calumet will run the operations, procure additional crude oil and market the products.

The joint venture stacks onto more than $1 billion in acquisitions by Calumet in a little more than a year.

The company had been pulling the bulk of its revenue from its specialty products, such as lubricants solvents and waxes.

But it began a spree of acquisitions—mostly refineries—in October 2011 that has since balanced its sales with gasoline, diesel and fuels in addition to its specialty products.

Most recently, Calumet finalized the $115 million purchase of a refinery in San Antonio, Texas. The company is also assessing the feasibility of building a shipping dock on Lake Superior near one of its refineries.

Calumet, which reports its fourth quarter and year-end earnings on Feb. 13, has seen its profit explode this year thanks to the acquisitions.

The company reported $42.4 million in earnings in its third quarter, up 116 percent from a year earlier.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT