Castleton Square Mall lands Borders replacement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The fast-growing fashion retailer Forever 21 plans to take over the former Borders space at Castleton Square Mall.

The privately held California-based chain, which currently has a smaller store at the mall, has begun converting the roughly 25,000-square-foot former bookstore at the south entrance and is targeting a summer opening.

It's the first of six vacant Borders spaces in central Indiana to land a permanent tenant, but real estate brokers say suitors are considering the others, particularly former bookstore locations across from The Fashion Mall at Keystone, near Greenwood Park Mall and at Hamilton Town Center.

"To turn the Borders into a Forever 21 is going to be very well received and will generate very good business for the mall and other tenants," said Bill French, a senior vice president of retail at the brokerage Cassidy Turley.

The Castleton store remained open through the bookstore chain's liquidation last year, along with stores at Hamilton Town Center and at U.S. 31 and Shelby Street on the south side.

Those stores, along with the former Borders at The Shops at River Crossing near The Fashion Mall, have the brightest prospects for landing replacement tenants, brokers said. Vacant stores downtown and in Carmel likely face longer odds.

French, who has the listing for the southside location, said several potential furniture, apparel and even restaurant/nightclub tenants have looked at the space. One advantage of the former Greenwood Borders is it sits next to a long-vacant Linens & Things, which means a tenant could assemble an end-cap with about 58,000 square feet of space.

Potential tenants for the Borders space at The Shops at River Crossing include Fashion Mall tenants looking to expand at lower rents or new-to-market concepts looking to break into the city's most high-end retail corridor.

The owner of the space, locally based PK Partners, likely will divide it to accommodate multiple tenants, said leasing agent Barbara Zike. She said several potential tenants are eager for the space but no leases have been finalized.

An official at Hamilton Town Center said manager Simon Property Group is working on a lease deal for the former Borders at the mall's entrance, though he declined to identify the prospective tenant. An organic grocery concept had been looking at the space last year.

Retail brokers told IBJ in July the vacant bookstore locations likely would not languish on the market since the chain had chosen its real estate more carefully than the likes of Circuit City and Cub Foods.

The Borders stores at Castleton Square Mall and Hamilton Town Center sit at the front door of successful malls, the River Crossing store is next door to The Fashion Mall at Keystone, and the former downtown Borders stands at the prime corner of Washington and Meridian streets.

The shuttered former stores range in size from about 23,000 square feet to 33,000 square feet.


  • The Market
    Clearly, Forever 21 sees the need to expand at this mall due to customer demand. The rent was probably adjusted, and tenant improvements increased, in order to fill a hole that no other retailer found that inviting.
    Sad state of affairs that the stores that are prospering sell this cheap, tacky, and all made in China garbage. The beautiful Takisamaya store on 5th Ave in NYC is now a Forever 21 as well - truly sad. The good upscale stores will remain to stay and open at The Fashion Mall and everywhere else will continue a downhill slide into indistinguishable sprawl. SAD
  • Modernize Zoning Requirements?
    What needs to happen is some sort of zoning type requirement so that a balance is maintained where it isnt just shopping. I understand that would be very difficult to define, but Borders adds a type of venue that isnt just shopping. There is an intellectual element it brings. In this new age of electronic books I admit I dont know what that would be, but just more shopping or restaurants is not good socially. The free market is not going to bring what is needed. Granted, neither may govt, but otherwise you get the equivalent of truck stops near housing additions.
  • Old Store
    There's already a Forever 21 in the Castleton Mall. What happens to their old store near Finish Line?
  • Type of store?
    I could guess via the name, but not once did they actually say the store's raison d'etre.
  • Sigh
    That's so depressing.
  • Forever 21
    The Forever 21 needs to carry men's clothing also. I do not believe Indianapolis has achieved this yet.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.