IBJNews

Chicago's experience causes other cities to redo parking deals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chicago’s agreement for a Morgan Stanley partnership to run its parking meters for 75 years, expected to cost drivers $11.6 billion, has Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles rethinking their own deals.

Indianapolis' City-County Council could vote Monday night on its proposed 50-year agreement with Xerox Co.’s Affiliated Computer Services, which would collect less money up front in favor of more total fees over the life of the deal. It also includes something Chicago didn’t get: exit clauses that let the city end the lease.

“We have terms that are not in Chicago’s deal,” said Deputy Mayor Michael Huber, who negotiated with Affiliated Computer. “We’ve built in a lot of flexibility.”

City officials introduced the current version of the agreement Oct. 20, after public outcry over the original plan to lease the roughly 3,650 metered spaces to Dallas-based ACS. The initial proposal was closer to Chicago's much-maligned pact.

Chicago’s agreement may earn the Morgan Stanley group 10 times the $1.15 billion lump sum Mayor Richard Daley got when he forced the City Council to consider the deal on a few days notice in 2008, according to documents for a planned private note sale by the Chicago Parking Meters LLC venture. The experience shows the pitfalls of a hasty process that doesn’t weigh all the costs, said former Chicago Inspector General David Hoffman.

“It’s a mistake to rush into a deal for such a long period of time without a full public accounting of the pros and cons,” Hoffman told Bloomberg.

Among the cons for Chicago was that the city was unable to take advantage of falling interest rates by borrowing against parking-meter revenue, said Hoffman. Chicago Parking Meters, the partnership of Morgan Stanley, Alliance Capital Partners GmbH and Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, did.

It recovered part of its upfront costs when it sold $600 million of 10-year notes on Nov. 4, the day investment-grade corporate debt yields fell to 3.53 percent, the lowest on record, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data.

Mayor Daley had reason to push for the parking lease with his city facing deficits. He’s since spent about $792 million of the Morgan Stanley money over three years for fiscal needs including balancing budgets, according to city reports.

The longest recession since the Great Depression cut U.S. cities’ general-fund revenue in the budget year that ended June 30 by the most since at least 1986, according to the National League of Cities. That’s prompted many to seek lower costs in partnerships with private companies to run everything from airports to zoos.

Los Angeles, facing a projected $550 million budget deficit by 2014, will spend the proceeds of its parking-meter agreement to help pay off building loans, meet current expenses and add to reserves. Pittsburgh needs the money for city pensions.

Indianapolis has taken its time considering a parking deal—originally proposed in August—because it wasn’t seeking funds for its budget, Huber said. State law requires the proceeds be used to repair streets adjacent to the meters, he said.

The city wants a private company to take over the system because it needs an upgrade, Huber said. Some meters haven’t been replaced and rates haven’t been raised for 35 years.

Modifications to proposal cut the city's upfront payment to $20 million from $35 million, but also increased the amount it would receive over the contract to $620 million from $400 million.

The changes also added the ability to terminate the contract every 10 years. Chicago can’t get its system back for 75 years unless Morgan Stanley and its partners default, according to documents for a bond sale planned in August that was delayed until November.

 Indianapolis' arrangement still favors the contractor, said Phineas Baxandall, a senior analyst for tax and budget policy in Boston with U.S. PIRG, a federation of state public-interest research groups.

The city’s total income of about $640 million over the life of the arrangement is less than half the $1.5 billion the private group could make in the period, he said.

“The cost is way out of line,” said Baxandall. Private deals can be tax increases in disguise, he said.

Contractors are better managers of parking systems than municipalities, said David Cummins, vice president of parking at Affiliated Computer in Germantown, Maryland.

“We can double and triple the revenue a city can generate on its own,” he said. “It’s a little ludicrous for a city to think it can build a parking system on its own and see the same results our concession envisions. They should leave it to the experts.”

The Pittsburgh City Council rejected a $451 million agreement with a JPMorgan Chase & Co. group last month amid concerns about its length and the possibility of rate increases.

“Pittsburgh’s City Council stood up and said the city doesn’t have to take a bad deal,” Baxandall said.

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl wants to revive the proposal to help Pittsburgh meet a Jan. 1 deadline to make a $225 million payment to the city’s pension, said his spokeswoman, Joanna Doven. The state may take over the pension if the city misses the contribution, she said.

“We believe it’s the best thing for the city,” said Doven.

Los Angeles city administrator Miguel Santana is seeking private companies to run municipal parking garages, possibly earning upfront payments of as much as $300 million for a 50- year agreement. He plans to present final bids to the City Council by February, he said in an interview last month.

Santana recommended the city reject language similar to Chicago’s agreement that gave up control of parking rates, according to a Jan. 28 report. The Morgan Stanley group raised some central Chicago meter rates to $4.25 an hour from $3 since January 2009, and they will go to $6.25 in 2013, documents for its bond sale said.

Los Angeles, which may get a larger initial payment by giving up control over rates, decided to set a fee schedule for the first five years to shield residents from higher costs. Increases after that would be limited by the Consumer Price Index.

“We want to make sure there’s a value for the city,” Eric Garcetti, the council president, said in a telephone interview, “but not cede control in ways that residents would be hurt.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • CODE RED
    Can someone give Mayor Marine a Code Red... This guy is out of here. Anyone approving this ought to spend time in Federal Prison.

    Simply buy the new meters or meter station (like Minneapolis) and hire Global or Denision to handle it.

    Why in the Hell do we need to PAY ACS for anything?

    Can we privitize paying our taxes? Will ACS take over that responsibility.

    The Mayor, Vaughn, Loftus, and now the CCC ARE ABSOLUTELY NOT GOOD STEWARDS OF TAXPAYER OWNED ASSETS IF THIS GOES THRU.
  • Think man Think
    You know what they say about consumer scams, if it sounds too good to be true, it really is. So Ballard, this is a flat out NO. The only good is for your cronies and the company that is funding the GOP purses. Time for you to go along with all your corrupt "what's in it just for me" special interests.
  • Bad Deal
    Your basically selling an asset for half a century for less than half it's value. With tax caps in place Indianapolis needs to find more revenue NOW AND IN 2060 !
  • Unbelievable
    Race baiters enter parking proposal discussion

    http://ipopa.blogspot.com/2010/11/mayor-ballard-plays-race-card-democrat.html
  • Who is Looking Out For Us?
    The city currently has a public private partnership that has a private company operating our parking meters and garages.

    This proposal to add another contractor on top of this current vendor and introduce revenue sharing is outrageous.

    Taxpayers should keep 100% of the profits and use TIF funds to upgrade the meters.

    Contact Your City County Council Person Today

    http://www.indy.gov/eGov/Council/Councillors/Pages/home.aspx

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT