IBJNews

Church's fate in judge's hands after insurance scheme sours

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge will determine whether an Anderson church can exit bankruptcy with a lighter debt load, over objections from its bank lender, after a church scheme to profit by selling life insurance on its elderly members failed.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Frank J. Otte took the case under advisement late Tuesday after a one-day bench trial in Indianapolis. A ruling is expected in a matter of weeks.

The case pits Fort Wayne-based lender Star Financial Bank against the Lindberg Road Church of Christ, which in 2006 took out life insurance on 11 members, hoping the proceeds would help finance church upgrades.

The church filed for bankruptcy reorganization earlier this year after it failed to hammer out a settlement with the bank, which is owed about $2 million. The church's attorneys want the court to relieve most of the debt, based on the failure of the life-insurance strategy it claims Star endorsed.

Star's attorneys say the bank's underwriting did not rely on life-insurance proceeds, and a bank employee warned the church it shouldn't rely on them, either. The bank believes the church can afford to pay because the loans also were backed by the church's real estate, which was recently appraised at $2.4 million.

David Kleiman, an attorney for the church, in his opening statement asked the court to "rectify a terrible wrong" and called the bank's actions "deceitful."

He said the church only intended to borrow $700,000, but the bank insisted on selling a "dangerous product" to a "small, unsophisticated church." He argued a series of internal bank documents that make up the backbone of the church's case show the bank ignored internal warnings and those from other banks, and left the church in the dark about the risks it was facing.

"This is the perfect case to really carry out what we've always said, that the bankruptcy court is a court of equity," argued Kleiman, of Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aranoff LLP, adding later about Star's employees: "They're not bad people. They simply ignored their customer. They didn't do the things any bank should do."

Star tried to block the church from presenting internal bank documents as part of its case, but Judge Otte ruled for the church, saying "the story needs to be told" because of the "extremely unusual circumstances" of the case.

Attorneys for the bank have suggested the church is trying to use the failed investment, known as Life Legacy, as a scapegoat to erase its obligation to repay loans whose proceeds paid for tangible church improvements.

The bank extended about $1.8 million for improvements, including for a child care center, before agreeing to boost the credit extended to $2.5 million so the church could pay life insurance premiums on $4.35 million in coverage of elderly members.

"Life Legacy was an option the church wanted but not the only option discussed," said attorney Thomas C. Scherer, of Bingham Greenebaum Doll, who represents Star Financial.

Scherer noted the life insurance strategy was not a bank program, but rather a product pushed by Total Financial Group of Carmel, which approached the church separately.

The bank called as a witness Jack Harter, a former loan officer for Star who is now with Mainsource Bank. Harter said Star's underwriting did not lean on life-insurance proceeds for collateral. After all, the bank viewed the church's real estate as worth $2.4 million.

The church's proposed exit plan calls for Lindberg Road to pay Star $507,000, plus 4-percent interest, over 25 years. The remainder of the debt, $1.5 million, would be secured by the life insurance policies. Star’s objection argues the policies can’t serve as collateral.

The lone witness for the church—board member, elder and office manager Sherrill Allred—said he's confident the church can afford to make the payments. The total figure is based on what the church would still owe on the $700,000 it originally intended to borrow.

Allred said his confidence is based in large part on a lease with the affiliated school, which has agreed to pay $5,500 per month, though Allred acknowledged on the stand that the school is three months behind on rent.

The judge is expected to either accept the church's exit plan or send the parties back to the drawing board.

The church is not alone in facing financial troubles stemming from a reliance on life-insurance proceeds. The pattern is typical of life-insurance-finance programs that were promoted and sold to charities and churches across the country in recent years, usually with bad results for buyers, insurance experts told IBJ for a story in October.

The key to the plan was the insurance, which was supposed to pay off either in death benefits or through a sale of the policies on the secondary market. Neither avenue materialized, as too few church members died, and the secondary market dried up during the recession.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The Lord Shall Provide
    As a former banker that has done church loans, I assure you the church in Anderson is not worth $2.4MM, even though I have never seen it. The only use for a church is as another church, maybe a school. In Anderson I am pretty sure they are not in need of new schools. The bank would be lucky to sell the church for 1/3 of what they are owed, probably much less. Banks are in a lose/lose situation, in my opinion, by doing church loans at all. If a church loan goes bad, and several have over the past few years, the bank is the bad guy for asking to be repaid. If the bank gets the real estate back as collateral there is no way to sell it to repay thier loan. Church's should rent space on Sundays from local schools or other available real estate. Put the saved money towards helping others, which I beleive was the initial point anyway. Why does every religion need to build some sort of Taj Mahal that is used primarily one day a week? By the way, I think many would also be shocked by how much men of the cloth make with thier salary, housing allowance, car allowance, and health insurance benefits. It is a big number but it is all in the name of the lord.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT