IBJNews

CIB cuts price on Ober Building after inspections

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Capital Improvement Board of Marion County has agreed to slash its sale price on downtown's Ober Building by $700,000 after inspections showed problems including a leaky roof and damaged HVAC system.

Board members agreed unanimously Monday to sell the building at 107 S. Pennsylvania St. for $3.1 million—an 18 percent discount from the original sale price of $3.8 million—to an affiliate of the Steak n Shake restaurant chain.

Steak n Shake, the lone bidder for the building, terminated its purchase agreement late last year after discovering problems during a 60-day due-diligence period, said CIB President Ann Lathrop.

"I'm excited to be able to keep a corporate headquarters downtown," Lathrop said during Monday's meeting.

The lower-priced sale requires approval of the Metropolitan Development Commission, which is scheduled to consider the deal Feb. 20. Closing is scheduled for Feb. 28.

Steak n Shake had agreed in August 2012 to pay $3.8 million for the six-story office building and spend another $2 million on improvements before moving its headquarters to the thrid through sixth floors.

Steak n Shake now has its local offices in the Century Building on the opposite corner of Pennsylvania and Maryland streets from the Ober Building.

Longtime Ober Building tenant Ratio Architects Inc., which occupies the first and second floors, plans to remain in the building.

The sale will return the building to public tax rolls for the first time in 13 years. The CIB acquired the property for $5.5 million in 1999.

The 1910 building is named for C.S. Ober, a local businessman who founded Business Furniture Corp. and Stationers Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tax Rolls
    I think this seems like a deal the city manadated when they bailed out the CIB. The city desperately needs more buildings to return to the property tax rolls. Almost 30% of Indianapolis is exempt from certain taxes by non-profit or religeous status.
  • Overpaid
    Another classic example of buy high, sell low.
  • Smell Test
    Don, when has anything the CIB ever done passed the "smell test?"
  • Did they build a Nuclear Power Plant next Door or is the Soil Contaminated?
    I say keep the building at this point. Hell they may as well make it a homeless apartment shelter and benefit some segment of society. The buildings cost was $5.5 mill in 1999 and 14 years later it is only worth 56% of its original cost? I do not think that sounds right? Also how much did the incompetent CIB invest in the building over the 14 yrs? It is not like the building is next door to a SuperFund Site or next to a Nuclear Power Plant or even in a BLIGHTED area of town? What gives? Please explain the market devaluation in the building of 46%? THIS DOES NOT PASS THE SMELL TEST! How much cash flow does the building kick off annually? I would lever it and hold it and NOT Give it away.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Doug Henning!

    2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

    3. Magician and illusionist!

    4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

    5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

    ADVERTISEMENT