IBJNews

Indy corporate leaders eye nutrition initiative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The group that oversees Indiana’s economic development initiatives aimed at life sciences, information technology, transportation and clean technology is moving toward a fifth thrust focused on nutrition.

David Johnson, CEO of Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, said his group has been asked by major agriculture-related stakeholders throughout the state to look at “possibly” creating the initiative.

“That’s something we’re going to do,” Johnson said in a Sept. 3 interview.

CICP, a group of 55 corporate and university CEOs in Indiana, already has laid a fair bit of groundwork. That's because CICP’s life sciences initiative, BioCrossroads, published a report a year ago detailing the huge assets Indiana has in ag-related biotech.

Those assets, the report argued, could be harnessed to find ways to feed the world’s fast-growing population without the addition of land or water resources.

“It is the combination of traditional agricultural production capacity and the agricultural-related science and technology assets Indiana possesses that make it uniquely positioned to address and capitalize on the larger global trends that are going to reshape the agricultural industry over the next several decades,” Beth Bechdol, an Ice Miller consultant and former executive with the state agriculture department, wrote in the BioCrossroads report.

Since that report was issued, Johnson, who is also CEO of BioCrossroads, has spearheaded an effort to start the Indiana Biosciences Research Institute, which would be a joint effort of Indiana’s life sciences companies and universities to do research focused on metabolic diseases, such as diabetes.

Also since the report was issued, Johnson said, some of the key players in Indiana’s ag biotech industry have indicated they’d be willing to provide funding for an initiative focused on nutrition.

“There’s a huge amount of interest in this area,” Johnson said.

He mentioned research published in 2000 by Ohio-based consulting firm Battelle, which identified life sciences, information technology, transportation and advanced manufacturing as the areas with the most economic promise in Indiana.

“If Battelle were asked to come back and do another study today, they would unquestionably put agriculture technology at the center of it,” Johnson said.

Indiana’s three biggest institutions focused on agriculture biotechnology are Purdue University; Dow AgroSciences LLC, a division of Michigan-based Dow Chemical Co.; and Elanco, the animal health division of Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co.

Other tech-focused agriculture companies include Atlanta-based Beck’s Hybrids and Sheridan-based JBS United.

Purdue President Mitch Daniels announced last week that the university would direct $20 million in additional funding to its plant sciences research. And in a speech on Friday, he threw support behind the economic potential of ag biotech.

“Agriculture, at which we are very good, is a very, very high-tech business these days,” Daniels told the Economic Club of Indiana.

Johnson cautioned that CICP still must do the work necessary to see if there are enough projects that an agriculture initiative could tackle to sustain beyond a year or two. Until CICP makes that determination, it says its agriculture work is only a project, not a full-fledged initiative.

“It takes a year or two to really know if there’s a long-term initiative there or not,” Johnson said. But, he added, “We’re really excited about this.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT