A panel of judges has chosen three prize winners from among 12 finalists in the Monument Circle Idea Competition, a public
call for suggestions on how to improve the look and use of Indianapolis’ city center.
Their top three picks—which received cash prizes—were unveiled Wednesday afternoon. Posters highlighting nine
of the proposals have been on display in storefronts around the Circle since at least Tuesday afternoon.
First: From Inertia to Inner Circle, submitted by Jean-Baptiste Cuelle and Francois David of Paris, focuses on opening up the space around the monument to allow for more natural interactivity between pedestrians. $5,000 prize.
Second: RE:Centering Indianapolis 1001, submitted by Indianapolis-based Ratio Architects’ Urban Design Studio, envisions many small changes, including adding a local grocer and reducing vehicular traffic to one lane to allow for sidewalk cafes. $2,000 prize.
Third: Nexus: Indianapolis, submitted by Studio Three Architects Brian Hollars, Lohren Deeg and Kerry LaPrees of Muncie, proposes reserving the northwest quadrant of the Circle for pedestrian use only. $1,000 prize.
The competition, announced in March, came about after Indianapolis hosted a CEOs for Cities event last October that brought
together local stakeholders and national experts to brainstorm ideas for making cities more livable. The group of urban leaders
was dazzled by Monument Circle, but puzzled by its apparent under-use.
A similar competition in 2008 raised ideas for the Grand Army Plaza in Brooklyn, N.Y.
Ideas generated by the contest may be considered by planners already working on the future of the Circle. The Indianapolis
Department of Public Works has retained the team of local design firms Woolpert Inc., Browning Day Mullins Dierdorf Architects
Inc. and Eden Collaborative to conduct a scoping study.
All the finalists suggest a variety of ways to make Monument Circle more dynamic, including expanded pedestrian space, reduced
traffic lanes, more green space, interactive water features and cafes, all of which are common elements in successful public
spaces, national design and urban planning experts told IBJ.
However, some suggestions are completely original.
Christopher Short, principal of Indianapolis-based Haus|The Architecture Studio and co-designer of the “The Pulse”
proposal, said he and his partner tried to focus on the perimeter of Monument Circle. He and Derek Mills, designed mobile
canopy structures that can be placed around the Circle in a variety of different arrangements. The canopies can cover parking,
seating and food stands and could even accommodate a light show.
“We intended to improve the human scale by narrowing the vehicular traffic lanes and focus on the experience of looking
toward the monument,” Short said.
Other original ideas include a pedestrian promenade from the monument to the state Capitol building and a glass-enclosed
café at the base of the monument.
Finalists hailed from Indianapolis, Muncie, California, Georgia, Massachusetts, Ohio, France and England.
Posters representing all 12 finalists will remain on display on Monument Circle until June 26, to allow the public to vote
via text message for the People’s Choice winner, which also gets a cash prize. That winner will be announced June 28.
All prize funds were raised through private donations.
CICF is a co-partner of the competition, along with Indianapolis Downtown Inc., which is overseeing the project.

















IBJ Conversations
11 Comments
Add Comment
I have no personal connection to Ratio, but I do think it is ridiculous that a local Indiana company is getting flak from self-righteous and misguided inviduals such as a yourself.
And, yes, I am waiting to read your response about my point about Frank Lloyd Wright's designs being appropriated by SOA.
However, as you claim that you wish to stand firm on principle, then I would stated that you that you cannot pick and choose as to when to stand firm and when to stand down. So, I ask, did SOA properly credit Frank Llyod Wright for providing the idea for their "green design" building? I ask because their supposed novel building looks suspiciously similar to many of Wright's famous (and never built) skyscraper designs. Hold SOA to the same standard you wish to hold Ratio, and then I and others may take your comments a bit more seriously.
( clearly not their idea ), then credit it, be truthful and move on. Isn't that all we were taught to be from our society? being truthful and don't take ideas from others and CLAIM it as your own? This case is worst, just cut and paste and submit as their submission...Then win from it, Are we saying to the public that such act is right?
This is a question of being fair and I do not think that the other entrants and the public will leave it to rest as this is truely a matter of what is right or wrong ( Intregrity )...and clearly a small act of plagiarism is still plagiarism. Can anyone being caught robbing say to the public that they were just robbing a little? robbing is still robbing and I would just wish that the winning team will man up and just apologize and move on. The longer this drags out the more outrage the design community will get...and trust me this will not go away softly because this is NOT RIGHT! Luckily for social media, even big corporations will not be able to cover this up anymore..just see recent incidents around the world. Fight for what is right and show our next generation that such act will not be tolerated.
We are gearing up to create blogs, tweets, letters, petitions etc to expose this to the public that might not know about this and push for a JUST response from IDI and Ratio...
This competition was primarily meant to benefit the city, not create award winners etc. Humility in this matter would be worth while to clearly understand the scope of the competition. Do not allow your personal relationships with people on other teams skew what this was about.
For the general public that is not familiar with current french architecture, they will definitely be 100% misguided that what they see are what is from the designers, and definitely will find the green technology a way to go for the future and vote for it then,
If this is just a fun thing to do cropping out a design not from them and place it in the submission knowingly that the general public will be misguided..then why not just draw a box and label the same thing or even just list it in the submission text? i know some might just think that this is nothing but to the entrants that put so many hours and hard work on the submission and knowing that what might take to just cut and paste a few ideas from others and submit the design will get themselves into 2nd place...who will ever want to work for anything else anymore! this is a bad example for where the profession is heading...and Just some respect for people that really work for it...That's all Chuck.
Having said that, IBJ's slide show is just about worthless. Gabrielle, can't you link to some larger photos?
to (SOA) at http://www.soa-architectes.fr/media/pdfs/1304949577p016_tour_vivante.pdf
This is Plagiarism and the ethical question is that, Can we as design professionals just cut and past anything we find interesting ,submit as our own idea and win a prize? What should IDI do to address concerns from a lot of people that used countless of hours to submit original ideas?