IBJNews

City considers tougher ticket-scalping regulations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis wants to limit the number of scalpers hawking tickets near sports stadiums and concert venues by requiring them to purchase an annual license.

Members of the City-County Council’s Rules and Public Policy Committee are set to vote on a proposal Wednesday evening. If passed, the full council could consider the measure at its Aug. 15 meeting.

Long unregulated—and legal—in Indianapolis, ticket scalping typically draws dozens of so-called brokers who linger along the streets and sidewalks in front of Conseco Fieldhouse before basketball games and concerts.

But it’s Indianapolis’ hosting of the Super Bowl at Lucas Oil Stadium Feb. 5 that prompted city leaders to craft a proposal. An ordinance regulating scalping is a National Football League requirement for any city vying for the game, said Susan Williams, president of the Indiana Sports Corp.

The aim is to protect visitors from buying counterfeit tickets and to reduce the throng of scalpers who can congregate for an event as large as the Super Bowl.

“You see big crowds of people trying to get into venues, and you’ve got scalpers,” Williams said. “It’s really uncomfortable. Some people don’t come downtown except for Colts games, and they’re kind of wigged out [by scalpers].”

Under the proposal, scalpers would need to purchase a yearly license from the city’s Office of Code Enforcement to sell tickets within one mile of a venue.

Annual fees for a license to sell tickets would be $57. Exceptions have been made for those who have permission to resell tickets from the event organizer, or who resell tickets for face value or less.

Inspectors from the Department of Code Enforcement or officers from the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department will have the authority to seize unlicensed property, according to the proposal.

City-County Councilor Michael McQuillen, chairman of the Rules and Public Policy Committee, supports the measure.

“When people are approaching a venue, whether it’s a basketball game or football game, we don’t want our visitors being harassed by umpteen different ticket brokers or scalpers,” said McQuillen, a Republican.

McQuillen, a business owner who deals in antiques and collectibles, said he usually favors a person’s right to sell their products freely. But, in the case of scalpers, he thinks there at least needs to be some sort of city control over the practice.

An estimated 150,000 people are expected to visit Indianapolis for the Super Bowl. An ordinance, however, also could limit scalping for the inaugural Big Ten football title game in December, which also will be played at Lucas Oil Stadium. Indianapolis will host the conference football championship at least through 2015.

In addition, Indianapolis will host the Big Ten men’s basketball tournament in 2012 and again in 2014 and 2016. Games have been played at Conseco Fieldhouse since 2002.

Indiana Pacers officials haven’t taken a formal position on the proposal, said Greg Schenkel, the team’s vice president of corporate and public relations. Yet, he acknowledged that “you want good business practices no matter who’s selling.”

Officials say most scalpers selling tickets from the street work independently. Larger, more organized brokers, notably national giant StubHub, sell tickets online rather than at the venue.

The convenience of purchasing tickets with a click of a mouse or by mobile phone has led to explosive growth within the industry. Local firms such as SportsEvents LLC have carved out a piece of the market and could benefit from additional sales if the City-County Council passes the ordinance.

The law could drive up ticket prices for some events because organized ticket brokers would face less competition from scalpers.

However, more local regulation would improve the overall reputation of the ticket-brokering industry, said Kyle Kinnett, chief operating officer of SportsEvents.

“There are a handful of guys that you can trust,” he said. “And the other guys are out there trying to feed themselves.”


 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Going too far
    I actually had the opportunity to go to the Super Bowl 2010 In FL. Requiring a license will not stop the frenzy for tickets. We now are making persons get a license to park cars on their private property. Is there no stopping the Mayor and City Council from intruding on the independent spirit and business opportunities of individuals? The tickets for the Super Bowl are hologramed and raised to combat counterfeiting tickets. This fact is well advertised prior to the event. I see no ordinance or law outlawing ticket brokers or Ticket Master or Live Nation from buying up the best tickets for resale. Let's get real people.
  • Protection or Money Grab?
    If you've ever bought a ticket that was a fake, I'm sure you would like to have a license number - against which you could make a complaint or seek restitution. The real question is whether this licensing requirement actually does anything to protect the consumer against fraud. Will the licensee be required to post a performance bond? If it protects the consumer, it's probably a great improvement in preparation for the Super Bowl. If not, this is just a money grab for the city. Caveat Emptor!
  • Reality Check
    I agree, this is a stupid law as it takes away some rights from the people. Please contact the City-County Council’s Rules and Public Policy Committee. Their email addresses are: mike@mikemcquillen.com, jmsanders@msn.com, mgray@indy.gov, rlutz@indy.org, angelamansfield@aol.com, riveraforcouncil@gmail.com, rvaughn@indy.org. I could not find Mr. Bob Cockrum of District 22's email address.
  • Right on, Bill and Joe!
    Both comments are spot on @Joe: The city has their head burried deep into the SuperBowl and not burried into their constituents' needs. @Bill: tHe city wants more regulation just to justify their red-tape machine and they want the $ from licensing. They want their piece of EVERYTHING! They even want to license the parking in folks front yards - even the city could care less about the underservewd neighborhoods.
  • News Release
    Every news release that comes out of the City-County Building between now and next February should come with the following standard introduction: "In preparation for the Super Bowl....."
  • More Regulation
    Creating more laws, regulation and more red tape will solve all our problems - right. I have tickets for Colts, Pacers, IU games and regularly attend the Big Ten Tournament and occasionally have extra tickets to sell. I don't want or need to be restricted or subject to more regulation. If I am not free to sell my tickets as I choose I will be less likely to be a season ticket holder and less likely to attend events. Hey, Kyle Kinnett and Susan Williams the free market really works so stay out of this business and let me be free to sell what I own.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

    ADVERTISEMENT