IBJNews

City goes after tow-company license

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis is moving to revoke the license of a prominent local towing company that officials say has violated local ordinances and elicited more than two dozen consumer complaints.

The city’s Department of Code Enforcement on Monday issued a hearing notice to Interstate/Delaware and South Towing for license revocation or suspension.

According to the city, the company, which has locations downtown on Delaware Street and on Kitley Road on the city’s east side, has not upheld requirements to post signage and to get approval from parking lot owners or authorized agents before towing vehicles. The firm received a citation for inadequate signage in late October.

Interstate/Delaware and South’s general manager, Brian Meyer, could not be reached for comment Tuesday morning.

Earlier this year, the City-County Council approved regulations to prevent companies from engaging in predatory towing practices. The new rules include caps for towing and storage fees, requirements that towing companies accept cash and credit-card payments, and 24/7 access to towed vehicles.

Interstate/Delaware and South is the first towing company to face a license hearing since those provisions were put in place, said Kate Johnson, a spokeswoman for the Department of Code Enforcment.

Code enforcement officials have received 28 citizen complaints since late August that Interstate/Delaware and South violated these and other rules, including  exceeding the fee cap and failing to post sufficient signage.

A hearing on the license is scheduled for Jan. 10, when an administrative law judge will determine whether to revoke the company's license.

If its license is revoked, Interstate/Delaware and South could be prohibited from towing vehicles without consent of their owners in Indianapolis for up to a year, Johnson said.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • One upside of the parking meter privatization...
    ... is that they did away with much of the silly "No Parking 3-6 pm zones" on Delaware Street since ACS decided they'd like to increase the meter revenue. Tom should probably also be upset with the IMPD also though, because I use to be able to see those cars get towed on Delaware every day and the tow trucks couldn't take them until after the cop wrote them a ticket.
  • making the world a better place
    So Daddy what do you do for a living? Oh, I create misery, steal money and suck the life out of society. Merry Xmas honey.
  • AMEN
    Delaware & South has ALWAYS been quick to snatch. One time, I came out of a store downtown and arrived at the meter where I had parked, and no car... at 3:01 PM. Still time on the meter, but they had a dozen or more cars within 30 seconds of the start of the parking ban. No, they weren't just finishing up getting hooked up, they were GONE. I used to drive a wrecker back when gas stations had their own, so I know exactly how ling it took to get hooked up. They HAD to have started about 2:50 that afternoon. I say NAIL 'EM GOOD!
    • Justice
      Let's start a class action suit against these thieves. I know at least 10 people who frauduently had their vehicles hooked in unposted lots that had always allowed parking. Some hard working restaurant workers barely making minimum wage.$170 fees and no car after a 12 hour shift. What despicible parasites.
    • gta
      Next time they grab a car charge them with grand theft auto. Maybe that will slow them down a bit.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

      I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

      Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

    2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

    3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

    4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

    5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

    ADVERTISEMENT