IBJNews

City seeks bids for $300M sewage tunnel system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City officials are seeking bidders for the first phase of Indianapolis' largest-ever public works project, an underground tunnel system equipped to store millions of gallons of raw sewage and prevent the excrement from flowing into local waterways.

The project, part of a 2010 settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, calls for a system of five wastewater storage tunnels to be built by 2025 at a total cost of more than $1 billion.

The first phase, a so-called Deep Rock Tunnel Connector, would be built 250 feet below ground and stretch seven miles north from the Southport Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant on the southwest side. It would hold up to 54 million gallons of raw sewage, and cost up to $300 million to build.

The Department of Public Works plans to start seeking bids for the work on May 16, and is set to open bids July 19. Construction is scheduled to begin in late 2011 or early 2012.

The other four storage tunnels will run along White River, Fall Creek, Pleasant Run and Pogues Run. The city's agreement with the EPA requires the system be operational by 2025.

City and federal officials reached a deal in 2010 that paved the way for the tunnel system. The agreement includes an accelerated construction schedule for the city's efforts to reduce sewage overflows from systems that carry both storm runoff and sanitary waste.

The new plan is expected to reduce overflows from about 7.8 billion gallons to about 414 million gallons per year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Cost
    Actually when procurement is done a cost estimate is used to help evaluate the bids when they come in. Something to far askew tends to lend itself to something being missed or gold plated.
  • Estimated Cost
    The estimated cost or "Engineers Estimate" is a figure determined by the Consulting Engineer based on standards and practices for that application. It is an approximation only. If received bids are substantially higher or lower it initiates a re-evaluation of the project.
  • $300M
    If they are just now seeking bids, then how do they know this will be a $300M project? Doesn't this pretty much ensure the project will not be any less than this amount?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT