IBJNews

City tries to raise cash by privatizing operations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Year In Review

In 2009, Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard pulled out his predecessor Steve Goldsmith’s Republican playbook and began exploring a host of potential privatization proposals in an effort to save money.

Ballard issued a series of open requests to businesses asking for their best ideas about how to operate and, in some cases, redevelop all sorts of city assets and services.

Ballard

Perhaps the biggest was professional sports stadium and convention center management. Local and national companies are vying for the opportunity to take over operation of Lucas Oil Stadium, the expanded Indiana Convention Center and, perhaps, Conseco Fieldhouse if the Indiana Pacers consent.

Global relationships are the main currency major stadium management firms can carry to the table in Indianapolis. With contacts throughout the entertainment industry and the mass buying power that comes from running many facilities, they can negotiate bargains when booking talent. They can also increase stadium revenue by attracting new major ticketed events to Indianapolis, from pop-superstar concerts to monster truck events.

Sports business experts consistently point to three companies as the likeliest bidders for Indianapolis stadium management. Two are based in Philadelphia: SMG, which already manages five NFL stadiums, and Global Spectrum, which handles one. The third, AEG, is Los Angeles based and has no NFL facilities.

Filling Lucas Oil Stadium more frequently when the Colts aren’t playing is a key part of the plan. So are expense reductions, thanks to mass purchasing, which could cover anything from hot dogs to crowd control to janitorial services. The public will find out what’s under consideration in January, when Ballard releases the business proposals.

Ballard also has solicited privatization pitches for water and sewer utilities, golf courses, parking meters and downtown’s City Market. Ballard hopes a business will redevelop the historic venue’s two underused wings, perhaps with a fitness center on one side and a performing arts facility on the other. The city is even exploring selling naming rights of its assets in exchange for goods or services.•

 

 

 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

    I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

    Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

  2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

  3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

  4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

  5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

ADVERTISEMENT