Clarian, Morgan clear way for merger

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The merger of Morgan Hospital & Medical Center into Clarian Health got the go-ahead from all parties in the past week, opening the way for Morgan to bring new doctors to its facilities.

Morgan County officials OK’d the deal Monday night after Clarian’s board gave its approval last week. The merger is expected to be official as of Jan. 31.

Morgan Hospital CEO Tom Laux has a variety of operational duties to focus on—developing new bylaws, populating an expanded board, transferring all Morgan employees over to the new entity formed by the merger and changing signage.

But beyond that, he’s focusing on tapping some the specialists in the Clarian system, particularly in ophthalmology and cardiology.

“We anticipate some fairly rapid growth in specialties,” he said Tuesday. He added that Morgan will try to hire more health care providers to staff its physician health centers around the county, and perhaps have more Clarian doctors see patients at Morgan facilities.

Access to specialist physicians is a common reason many smaller hospitals have chosen to merge recently with larger systems. Morgan also thinks Clarian’s buying power can help it save $2 million a year in expenses as well as help it negotiate higher reimbursement rates from private health insurance plans.

Morgan and Clarian partially integrated back in early 2006. And while a merger wasn’t inevitable as part of that agreement, it became the natural choice, Laux said—especially after the health reform law created new pressures and incentives for hospitals to get larger.

“It just seemed a good fit,” Laux said.

Clarian, with nearly $4 billion in revenue, dwarfs Morgan in size. The county-owned hospital has annual revenue of $49 million.

Morgan will be the 17th hospital Clarian owns around the state. It is also talking to White County Memorial Hospital in Monticello about a merger.

Clarian will change its name next year to Indiana University Health to capitalize on its connection with the IU School of Medicine.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1