Colts confident they can sell new luxury suites

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There’s a simple reason why the Indianapolis Colts want two new suites inside Lucas Oil Stadium, the cost of which will be borne by the city.

“The demand is there for us to sell them,” said Colts Chief Operating Officer Pete Ward.

Demand for the pricey luxury suites isn’t league-wide. Many of the NFL’s 32 teams are struggling to sell their suites as the economy continues to wobble and myriad factors constrain corporate spending.

“The demand for suites is very market-specific,” said Marc Ganis, a Chicago-based sports business consultant who counts several NFL teams as clients.

The Colts and the city’s Capital Improvement Board last week jointly agreed to build out two of the six remaining vacant suite spaces at the stadium. The city, which owns Lucas Oil Stadium, will pay $2 million, which is expected to be most or all of the cost of building out the two suites and two small suite-level kitchen spaces. The Colts will cover any overage.

The two new suites bring the total at the stadium to 143, and that’s significant inventory to move in a city the size of Indianapolis, Ganis said.

“The interest in the team within a community—and how closely the team and community are aligned—is what drives suite sales,” Ganis said. “In Indianapolis, the Colts are a story, and their games are an event.”

The team, Ganis said, has weaved itself seamlessly into Indianapolis’ culture. That effort got a big boost with Peyton Manning and continues with Manning’s replacement at quarterback, Andrew Luck.

While Ganis said the Colts have been fortunate to have players like Manning and Luck, they’ve also “taken advantage of their circumstances.”

“They manage their team and their people in a way that has embedded that team in the community,” Ganis said. “They’ve managed their team, their public relations and their customer relations in a way that the best teams have.”

The suite deal is part of a larger agreement that settled a dispute over concession operating expenses and called for the team to pay the cost of installing two ribbon boards. There are no current plans to build out the four remaining suite spaces.

Even though the Colts plays in a relatively small market with fewer corporate headquarters than many of its NFL counterparts, Ward said the demand for suites has remained strong.

“We’ve never really seen the demand for suites drop,” Ward said.

That includes during the depths of the post-2007 Great Recession and in the wake of the team’s 2011-12 season, which ended in a 2-14 record and the departure of all-pro quarterback Peyton Manning.

Colts officials have a waiting list for suits and don’t think they will have trouble selling the two new ones. One will seat 21 and the other 20. Both will be complete in November.

Pricing for the two new luxury boxes in the upper suite level at the south end of the field hasn’t been set yet. Current Lucas Oil Stadium suites are leased for between $40,000 and $250,000 annually, Ward said. The two new suites are mid-range in terms of capacity, and the price likely will follow suit.

Suites aren’t the only thing in demand at Colts games. The rate of season-ticket renewal this off-season is 95 percent, as is the renewal rate for pricey club seats, Ward said. Many of the stadium's most expensive seats—the 7,100 midfield club seats—were up for renewal after last season. Only about 200 of those remain for sale, and Ward expects those to be sold long before next season kicks off.

Suites and club seats are an important contributor to revenue, bringing in near $40 million annually for the team, sports business experts said.

There’s also an increased demand for ribbon board advertising, which is part of the reason for the addition of the two new  boards—in the northeast and southwest corners of the stadium—this off-season, Ward said.

The ribbon boards have also become a big attraction for fans in the stands.

“This goes back to trying to give fans in the stadium everything they can get at home on TV,” Ward said. “These boards allow us to put up continual fantasy [football] stats and team scores and statistics from around the league as well as sponsor messages.”

Attention from fans within a stadium is what makes them popular with a growing number of sponsors, Ganis said.

 “Anytime you can draw fans’ eyes to something, sponsors are going to want to be there," he said.

It’s also a relatively inexpensive way for sponsors to become involved with the team, Ganis added.

“Most of these [ribbon-board] deals are low- to mid-six-figure packages,” Ganis said. “But a sponsor can get his name, logo and message on a ribbon board for as low as five-figures.”



  • Colts
    I would assume this is a bone being thrown the Colts way for the increased admissions tax, which should amount to millions ($) each year.
  • Just so No
    This proposal is pathetic! It's time for some legislators to Just Say No and tell the Colts to spend the $2 million themselves, especially if they'll be the benefactors of this added revenue.
  • $'s work?
    So, assuming a $100,000 yearly cost for the suites, it will take the city 20 years to recoup this investment. What's the life expectancy of the stadium? 20 years like the Dome? With the building already a few years old, it is obvious this is a waste of money. And, this assumes the city keeps all proceeds from the suites. But, I'm sure they have an agreement to split with the Colts. Bad Investement, DON'T DO IT!
    • Gravy train continues
      Dear Colts--Anything else you need, anything at all, just let us taxpayers know. We will be happy to pay. You're welcome.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.