Customer-service jobs likely casualty in utility merger

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two dozen or so customer-service jobs could go down the drain after Citizens Energy Group buys the city’s water and sewer utilities, according to regulatory filings.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission is weighing the proposed $1.9 billion deal, which would combine the city’s utilities with Citizens, which operates Citizens Gas, and steam and chilled water divisions.

Citizens Energy estimates the merger could produce annual savings of $60 million by the third year, in part through a streamlined supply chain, and contracting and consolidated administrative functions.

Customer-service consolidation would produce among the smallest savings, at about $3.9 million in the third year, although it could represent the largest toll on employment.

An estimate prepared by Citizens’ consultant, Booz & Co. Inc., shows the potential to eliminate 17 out of the total 131 customer-service jobs now performed individually by Citizens and by Veolia.

Veolia has operated the water utility under contract for the city since 2002.

The estimate also shows the potential to eliminate six billing-service positions among the 19 total the two companies now maintain. As for non-labor costs within customer service, the combined utilities could save nearly $2 million annually in postage and remittance-processing costs.

Customer-service job losses could be handled entirely through attrition, however, because they tend be of a high-turnover nature, said Citizens spokesman Dan Considine.

"We’re looking at about a two-year period for the integration,” Considine said.

 As for other positions that could be eliminated, “we really don’t have a number,” he said, adding that integration work is just beginning.

Complicating matters might be union issues. Considine said Veolia’s customer service workers are represented by the Service Employees International Union. Under contract terms with Veolia, those workers, if their jobs are eliminated, must be offered other jobs at the utility.

Job cuts are not expected to be major contributors to merger savings, according to Thomas J. Flaherty, a senior VP of Booz & Co., in Dallas.

“The pre-existing structure and delivery model of the entities involved in this combination limits the impact of the combination on the number of staffing reductions that typically arise from utility mergers,” Flaherty said in testimony filed with the IURC.

One reason is the varied types of utilities, from water to gas, each with a specialized skill set.

The largest single savings from combining the utilities is an estimated $15-million-a-year reduction from the supply chain.

Flaherty said the combination will allow for economies of scale from aggregating related work activities and service agreements with third-party providers. Savings will come from lower per-unit costs for the services provided due to a broader contract or the repackaging of work into more attractive options to the contractor, he said.

“This ... realignment and volume purchasing of services is the primary method through which service-procurement savings are realized,” he said. Over 40 percent of the contract base is overlapping, “providing for significant opportunity to optimize the sourcing of these services on a combined basis.”

One “unique” area of savings in the supply chain involves the potential to save $6 million a year by allowing Citizens to take on certain capital projects now performed by Veolia. Under its contract with the city, Veolia is able to charge a margin of 12 percent over and above the costs it incurred to complete the capital work, Flaherty said.

Other large savings areas identified by Booz were $12.6 million in corporate center savings, such as consolidating overlapping finance functions, and $6.6 million in common design and engineering roles.

It’s not been determined to what degree Citizens will contract out some functions now performed by Veolia to wastewater operator United Water.

Veolia has a staff of 436; United, about 190 people locally, according to records.

The estimated $60 million in annual savings from the merger should trickle down to customers of all five utilities, officials say.

The sale of the water and sewer utilities should generate more than $425 million for the city, which plans to spend it on city infrastructure projects such as roads and bridges.

Citizens, a public charitable trust, is assuming more than $1 billion in debt from the city utilities.


  • Priorities
    You are correct. Peterson came to an agreement with the EPA to comply with the clean water act and thus obligated water & sewer customers to over a billion in upgrades to avoid dumping raw sewage into our waterways. In fairness, the previous two mayors before Peterson spent tens of million on EPA penalties and lawyer fees try to delay doing the right thing and missed out on Federal financial assistance to blunt the financial burden. Most recently Andre Carson and Mayor Ballard completely missed getting federal aid in the American Recovery Act to fix the EPA unfunded mandate, but seemed to think getting some sidewalk money was a higher priority.
  • Blaming the GOP
    I think it is funny that this is being spun as a "GOP" issue. Bart Peterson was the guy who doubled water and sewer rates to begin with, right before Ballard was elected. Bart Peterson was the guy who planned to spend 1.9 billion dollars on sewer and water. So in the issue of fairness, I am sure the same people were equally concerned about Peterson's debt burden right?
    • GOP Gimmik for Special Interests
      Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. Did you think that selling any government asset would save taxpayers anything? All it does is generate lots of profits (assured) to the cronies of the GOP who receive public assets given to them by their paid pansie elected officials. Mitch, Ballard, and the entire GOP know the truth, they see huge profits for the private sector in return for big donations. That is why we have 12 million excess income on bonds, but want to sell parking meters to a cronie because the city needs 10 million to buy new parking meters. The GOP would never think of spending the 10 million for new parking meters and have the profit go to the city. After all the city does not technically line their pockets in special favors and contributions.
    • Where's the Beef?
      Not only will this merger actually increase water/sewer rates to unrealistic levels with a unsustainable debt burden, but it will makes the city uncompetitive nationwide for attracting new jobs and investment.

      Plus this SALE price, doesn't even return the cities current investment or asset value. It is being given away for pennies on the dollar with vague promises and undocumented and contradictory data on efficiencies and cost savings.
    • Just Say No IURC
      The truth is that this merger does not produce significant savings from combing water and has operations. The city could cut these costs without the merger. In fact, this merger will require a larger rate increase than the 100% currently scheduled because it requires the new entity to borrow a half billion dollars to fuel the Mayors $425 million slush fund and $45 million break up fee with Veolia. The slush fund isn't even being used for EPA mandated water & sewer upgrades.

      The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission should deny this misguided merger and require the city to properly manage this vital community asset.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ