Daniels' book latest of many governors' tomes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For a two-time author, Gov. Mitch Daniels has a pretty dim view of his fellow elected scribes — and there are many.

"Despite a long involvement with public life, I have read very few books by public officials, past or present. Judging by the ones I have read, many are written to justify the authors' actions or, worse, to settle personal scores. Others aim to embellish the authors' role or proximity to major events, and still others are thinly veiled exercises in self-advertisement," Daniels writes in the introduction to his book, "Keeping the Republic."

Daniels discussed the book last month on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal," which also aired passages from the book. His book is due out Sept. 20, but copies have been circulating around Washington, D.C., for weeks.

Of the nation's 50 sitting governors, almost a quarter of them are authors. Four, including Daniels, have written tomes while serving as their state's chief executive. That number is set to increase by one early next year when South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley's book, "Can't is Not an Option," hits the bookshelves.

Another seven governors penned tomes before they took office: Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback and Ohio Gov. John Kasich wrote books, while California Gov. Jerry Brown's "Thoughts" came out in 1976 during his first go-round as governor.

The politician's tome has become "almost routine," said Peter Osnos, founder and editor-at-large of PublicAffairs Books.

"All of them want to be thought of as people who have something to say and they want to address their constituency," said Osnos, who helped publish President Barack Obama's first book, "Dreams from my Father," in 1995.

The book is a natural tool for politicians, Osnos said: it allows them to talk directly to a captive audience at length with no filters.

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick used his memoir released in April to detail his rise from poverty in Chicago to become his state's first black governor. Texas Gov. Rick Perry's "Fed Up!" was released nine months ago; it is filled with many proclamations he is now defending on the campaign trail — from likening Social Security to a "bad disease" to calling the nation's Supreme Court justices "oligarchs in robes."

Daniels spokeswoman Jane Jankowski deferred questions about the governor's decision to write a second book to his publisher. Spokeswomen for his publisher, Penguin Group's conservative imprint Sentinel, said they won't discuss the book until it goes on sale next week.

Before publishing Daniels' book, Sentinel published two books by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and is also scheduled to publish Haley's forthcoming book.

Daniels' first book, "Notes from the Road," reflected on his 2004 campaign for office.

The marketing campaign for Daniels' new publishing venture is well under way. A Twitter feed was launched last week linking to a sparsely populated website.

When he was being urged to write a book, Daniels said he made it clear he wanted to outline some policy prescriptions and not fall back into personal allegories or sniping.

"If I was going to put the time into it, I would like to try and say a few things about what I think are the central questions in front of us," Daniels said in the C-SPAN interview.

Those central questions revolve around curbing federal spending and reining in Social Security and entitlement spending before they "destroy the nation," he said.

He's also outlined a scenario in which China unloads its U.S. bonds, sparks a global sell-off of U.S. debt and America collapses into looting, rioting and martial law.

Had he run for president, Daniels would have been the norm among the candidates. Of the eight Republican presidential contenders who debated at the Reagan Library last week, only Rep. Michelle Bachmann and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. have not written books.

Even though he stayed out of the 2012 race, Daniels has the backing of one of Washington's most powerful attorneys: Robert Barnett. Among the many powerful authors he has represented are Obama, former President Bill Clinton and former Vice President Dick Cheney.

"It tells you that he's ambitious," Osnos said of Daniels picking Barnett to handle his book affairs. "Bob only handles the creme de la creme."


  • Perhaps his book will address his IBM contract
    Mitch has the time to write a book, but is too busy to testify on his involvement in the IBM contract?? Perhaps he explains his thoughts or lack of thoughts in his book. Seems like the book review is on Federal issues and not the damage he has done to the state of Indiana. (while claiming all good)

  • Comforting
    I would agree that the Daniels' biography would indeed be refreshing if he sticks to policy and avoids sniping...Dick Cheney's latest tome is the insufferable wailing of the ultimate megalomaniac (actually I don't know if the whole thing is that way, I had to quit after 3 chapters, and thank heavens I borrowed it). Having said that, how would a book like that sell...not as well as one like Cheney's I am certain. Who wants to read about China waiting until the perfect moment to "deep 6" the American economy?...(a perfectly plausible theory it is, alas). I think most people would rather read a guy like Cheney bad mouthing everyone he ever worked with, while celebrating his own genius, and his fears he could eventually be tried as a war criminal. Daniels' memoir would at least be food for thought, if there is anyone left who wants to think...

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now