IBJNews

Daniels opens door on 2012 presidential campaign

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has cracked open the door on a potential 2012 presidential run.

Washington Post political writer Dan Balz on Monday quoted Daniels in a blog post as saying he’s reluctant, but now “open” to the idea. Balz interviewed Daniels at the winter meeting of the National Governors Association in Washington D.C. over the weekend.

In numerous staunch denials over the years, Daniels, a Republican, has previously dismissed local and national speculation about his ambitions for a possible presidential bid. But, according to the Post, a series of conversations in recent months initiated by people who’d like him to run, including one with former president George W. Bush, convinced Daniels to reverse his position.

“Just to get them off my back, I agreed to a number of people that I will now stay open to the idea,” Daniels told the newspaper.

In response to an e-mail from IBJ, Daniels’ spokeswoman Jane Jankowski said the governor currently has nothing to add beyond what he told the Post.

According to the blog post, Daniels hasn’t taken any preliminary steps toward establishing a national campaign. Daniels told Balz he’ll spend the next year focused on Indiana’s problems.

“For now to a year-plus from now, that’s all I’m going to do,” Daniels said. “And if these people [encouraging a presidential bid] are still around, and still not fully satisfied with the field, and if I don’t see anybody who’s raising what I think of as the survival issues for the country, I guess I’d listen, if it’s not too late, which it might well be. I’ve told people if it’s too late, so be it.”

Daniels characterized his newfound openness to the nation’s highest office in terms of the same platform issue he’s consistently preached in Indiana: fiscal responsibility. The governor told the Post he believes some candidate needs to spearhead a national debate on debt, deficits and the size and role of government.

Whether that candidate is Daniels remains an open question.

“Are we still a country where people would prefer freedom, personal autonomy, with the risks and responsibilities that go with it, or do we want to socialize all the risks we can and settle for what I think is the false security of statism and so forth?” Daniels said. “I think those questions have got to be presented by somebody.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • and....

    >

    So you'd perfer an oversized gov't? Without getting into a mud fight about who is right & wrong, it's easy to explain a Liberal mindset: bring all privatized programs under the gov't and make sure it's available to everyone (as if it can't be done without the gov't absorbing it.

    The other thing to go with that is a large gov't is like an umbrella, giving everyone shelter when they need it. But it has to be big enough such that any holes which develop in the umbrella can be protected. If it keeps growing & growing, the greater the chances people should (ought to, but not necessarily will) everyone will be covered.

    There's an excellent example of outsourcing which most people won't think of it: Sallie Mae (nee USA Group). They were ahead of the curve.
    They saw an opportunity for a business and went for it. Obama wants to absorb many companies such as this one into the gov't. Why? Can the federal gov't do it better? I'm not looking at it from the # of jobs lost, I'm looking at how the entire system works.


    >

    One of the stories which was in the press dealt with people near the Illinois border, where people would cross over, drop their kids off at day care, return to Indiana to work. They whined it would screw up their schedules to be out of sync for 6 months. Regardless of the names for time zones, the way I had to express it to clients was, "we're on New York time" or, "We're on Chicago time." Back then they were out of synch six months, weren't they?



  • nah...
    I don't hate little Richie Mitch...it's just that his track record as head of OMB and Governor is a massive, epic FAIL...only off by about $2 TRILLION on the whole Iraq War thingy and Indiana has lost more jobs under Mitchie Rich than ANY other governor in Indiana history (ok so math is NOT his strong suit?!) so basically I mock him as often as I can, along with the morons who voted for him! :)
  • Joe...
    I love how your title describes you. I'm sure your friends family and co-workers appreciate you calling them all morons. I notice that you couldn't give an example of how he as wronged Indiana (I might argue education), but I'm sure it is easy for an enraged devout democrat to make that mistake.
    • Susan
      Daniels has proven he can get things done in Indiana in spite of the obstructionist Rep.Bauer. He has already cut budgets in the White House as budget director...Noone, bar none could be more needed, trusted, and experienced person (not politician) for the job. I hope the Republican powers that be start organizing for Daniels.
    • Yay!
      I once was a "Ditch Mitch" fan... Now I realize that he was able to rip that foreign company off for Indiana's own benefit and even though I hated changing time zones it was not that big of a deal. I would def be willing to help him campaign. He has done great things for Indiana... Its just too bad we wouldn't be able to keep him as our gov.
    • Campaign already started
      Daniel's talks to Barrons about his platform

      http://online.barrons.com/article/SB126662323671148747.html



    • Hole
      Mark, go back to your hole in South Bend. The biggest democrat in the midwest, Richard Daley, has privatized everything and I don't see you on msg boards talking about him.
    • Really?
      Got news for you, the rest of the country already is on the same time zone schedule as Indiana. WE were the only oddballs before.

      Will definitely be interesting to see if this comes to pass!
    • Love it!
      This country needs Daniels so badly. This is unbelievable news. He has been so committed to his State regardless of politics, I know he would do the same leading the country. Make it happen Mitch!
    • I'm with him
      I would gladly work on his campaign.
    • Really?
      Oh boy, maybe he can lease and outsource everything like he has done in Indiana.
      • Horray!!
        He will make a fantastic president. I am very happy about this news.
      • HURRAY!
        I MIGHT STILL BE DREAMING!!!!
      • Best news I've heard in a long while.
        Best news I've heard in a long while. As a registered voter - glad to hear this.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

      2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

      3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

      4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

      5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

      ADVERTISEMENT