IBJNews

Deadline looms to refile for homestead tax break

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Time is running out for some Hoosier homeowners to claim the Indiana Homestead Deduction as a tax break, even if they have done so in the past.

A law, passed in 2009, says homeowners will lose their deduction beginning in 2013 if they don’t complete and return a homestead verification form by Jan. 1.

County auditors began including the verification form in property tax bills in the spring of 2010. But thousands of homeowners in the Indianapolis area still have yet to submit it, particularly in heavily populated Marion and Hamilton counties.

Marion County Auditor Billie Breaux said her office has received forms from roughly 150,000 homeowners, or more than half, and is getting about 100 in the mail daily.

Breaux said she might send a mailer alerting those who have yet to refile. But “it’s expensive to send out the letters, and we’re on a very strict budget right now,” she said.

Homeowners are allowed to file for the deduction on their primary residence only. The aim of the legislation is to reduce tax fraud by Hoosiers who claim the deduction on more than one residence.

The form requires homeowners to include the last five digits of their Social Security number and the last five digits of their driver’s license—information that previously was not required.

The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance maintains a state database of homestead deduction information provided by county auditors. The database currently contains a homeowner’s name and address. But if the same name is listed five times, there is no way to determine if it’s five different people with the same name or if one person is claiming the deduction on multiple properties.

“There were so many people that had multiple homestead deductions, so the verification came up as a way to come clean,” said Rep. Cherrish Pryor, D-Indianapolis, who wrote the legislation. “We just want to make sure that people who are double-dipping are not pushing their tax burden on other people.”

The additional information on the verification form should prevent people from claiming multiple deductions under different names, Pryor said. Homeowner Robert Smith, for instance, now shouldn’t be able to file for the deduction on a rental unit under the name Bob Smith.

State law requires the state to mail the form with all property-tax statements through 2012. The form, however, must only be completed once by the homeowner, by Jan. 1.

Still, in Hamilton County, about 8,000 homeowners hadn’t submitted the verification form as of Nov. 27, even after they should have received at least five notifications, Auditor Dawn Coverdale said.

The last notification sent to 11,000 homeowners cost the county $8,300 in postage, she said.

But the county should recoup the costs in the additional tax money collected from scofflaws. The auditor’s office so far has caught about 2,000 homeowners who had filed for the tax break on more than one property, including one who had claimed a vacant commercial property as a residence, Coverdale said.

“It’s taken a lot of money and time,” she said, “but I think it’s been beneficial in cleaning up a lot of misapplied deductions.”

Both Breaux and Coverdale in Marion and Hamilton counties said they’ve heard rumblings that legislation could be introduced in the next session to extend the filing deadline.

Pryor said she’s not been approached by a fellow lawmaker proposing such an extension, “but if that’s something the auditors feel is needed, I probably would support it,” she said.

Average homeowners who fail to refile for the tax break risk losing hundreds of dollars annually in tax credits.

Anyone caught filing for multiple homestead deductions will have to pay back taxes, in addition to a fine of 10 percent of the amount owed.

Homeowners who are unsure if they filed the statements should call their auditor's office, at (317) 327-3001 in Marion County and (317) 776-8401 in Hamilton County.

Additional information on homestead verification forms can be found here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT