IBJNews

Delph gains names recognition in fight with own party

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When conservative state Sen. Mike Delph took to Twitter about gay marriage and ultimately lost his formal vestiges of power within the Senate Republican caucus, he gained something far more valuable in the world of politics: "Name ID."

The political lingo stands for public recognition — good, bad, beautiful or ugly, it all matters. Delph reaped it in spades last week, reeling in Statehouse media and Senate Republican leadership to keep him in the public eye.

It started when Delph tweeted angrily about the demise of the gay marriage ban just hours after the Senate decided earlier this month to push back a public vote on the ban until at least 2016. The fracas ended last week, as Senate Republican leaders stripped him of his formal rank within the caucus and moved his seat in the Senate chamber next to the Democrats.

While it might have looked like reckless politicking, the maneuver elevated Delph from a rank-and-file senator to receiving more attention than even Gov. Mike Pence.

But simply getting that acknowledgement is not a guarantee of success — especially if it's highly divisive — said Pete Seat, an Indiana Republican strategist and former Republican Party spokesman.

"Name ID is important because voters need to have familiarity with who you are and what you stand for," he said. "But it's not a guarantee of success. Just because they're familiar with your name doesn't necessarily mean they believe in the same things you stand for."

Take the 2012 gubernatorial race. Candidate John Gregg's advisers often said it was a good thing he wasn't widely known in the state because it allowed them to build an image. But Gregg was late to the advertising game, and found himself washed out not only by his opponent, Pence, but also by a sea of advertising in the U.S. Senate race.

Former Senate candidate Richard Mourdock had little trouble winning a Republican primary against Richard Lugar, in part because of Mourdock's own extensive work on the local fundraising circuit. Mourdock's recognition among the conservative base of voters was extensive, enough to knock out Lugar easily in the Republican primary.

When the general election got underway, Mourdock had little name recognition with the broader populace, something Democrats immediately used to their benefit with a barrage of negative advertising. But by the time Mourdock let slip a statement concerning God, rape and abortion just a couple of weeks before Election Day, his brand had already been defined.

Delph has declined comment about his Twitter battle and the sanctions levied against him by Senate Republicans. But in a Statehouse news conference last week — a rare occurrence for individual state senators — said he was whipping up a media storm in order to protect the definition of marriage being between one man and one woman.

Asked why he was making his arguments on social media and to reporters instead of the Senate chamber, where he was silent during the week of the marriage debate, Delph only said he was respecting the Republican caucus' code of silence about internal debates.

Delph has not said if he has aspirations for higher office. He's filed for re-election to the state Senate this year and missed perhaps his best chance to run for Congress in 2012 after his political mentor, former U.S. Rep. Dan Burton, retired.

But maintaining a strong base of name recognition is not always about winning the current election. It's often good for any future race.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Delph Is Clearly A Goofball
    Delph's recent publicity and the content of his rants only accentuate what a real goofball he is. Contrary to conventional wisdom, all publicity is not good.
  • 15 minutes over?
    I was thinking that, given Sen. Delph's grandstanding last week, IBJ's excellent editorial on why he needs to be voted out, and the fact that almost everyone who commented here said they didn't even realize he represented them, but they do now...given all that, Sen. Delph would not survive the next election...but we will see...as the article so aptly noted, Dan Burton represented the district for a long time...so I'm thinking that a lot of the folks in that district like having representatives that are certifiable, those folks just don't comment here...so we will see...there is some truth to the adage that there is no bad publicity...
  • What are Delph's Unfavorables?
    Good story, but I have to think that Mullah Mike's unfavorable ratings in any survey would be astronomical. His name recognition may be soaring, but it's not very helpful when most people view you unfavorably except those from the fringe

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT