IBJNews

Developer settles suit with Hudson condo residents

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The homeowners' association for a downtown Indianapolis condominium complex that claimed the building’s construction was faulty has settled its lawsuit with the developer.

Terms of the settlement, reached Wednesday, are confidential.

The Hudson Condominium Association Inc. filed the suit in Marion Superior Court in March against The Hudson Condominiums LLC, an entity established by Carmel-based Kosene & Kosene Residential Inc. to develop the project. The complaint also named builder Constructa Inc.

“The association is pleased to have resolved all pending litigation,” said attorney Joseph Chapelle, who represented the association, in a written statement. “The association is moving forward with taking care of the building and any necessary repairs are under way now.”

Kosene began construction on the 70-unit Hudson building at 355 E. Ohio St. in 2004 and finished in 2006. Units in the Hudson range from 901 square feet to 2,804 square feet, and originally sold for $176,350 to $721,517.

The complaint alleged that Hudson residents in 2011 began noticing cracks in the first-floor walls and ceiling. They also noticed a slope in the floor.

An engineering firm hired by the homeowners' association to examine the building concluded that improperly installed truss hangers had slipped, causing the floor trusses to move.

Engineers also determined that improperly placed backfill caused the floor of the basement garage to shift, according to the suit.

The homeowners' association sued Kosene for breach of implied warranty and negligence, and wanted the developer to pay to repair the building.

“We’re happy that we worked together with the association and the insurance company to reach a satisfactory settlement,” David Kosene, president of Kosene & Kosene, told IBJ.

The homeowners' association also filed a similar complaint against its insurer, The Travelers Indemnity Company of America.

Travelers had notified the association that it was denying coverage for the damage. But the association claims that an insurance policy it had with the company that ran through June 2011 should cover the damage.

That suit was dismissed from federal court in Indianapolis in late August.

The Hudson is one of three luxury condo projects, including the Maxwell and Packard, that Kosene has developed downtown and named after classic cars.

Repairs also continue at the Packard at 450 E. Ohio St. after its homeowners' association filed a similar lawsuit against Kosene & Kosene in June. The suit is pending in Marion Superior Court.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Kosene at Fault
    The Packard continues to find code violations & poor workmanship every day. Even the outdoor lights in the courtyard are out of code & a fire danger! NEVER trust a Kosene!
  • wrong name
    Guess they should have called the Hudson, the Pinto

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT