IBJNews

  • Home

Duke Realty’s quarterly results in line with expectations

IBJ Staff
April 26, 2012
Keywords
Commercial Real Estate, Duke Realty Corp., Financial Results, Real Estate & Retail, Real Estate Investment Trust
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based Duke Realty Corp.’s financial performance in the first quarter met analyst expectations even though the company suffered a $36 million loss and saw revenue decline by $65 million.

The real estate investment trust said Wednesday that core funds from operations for the quarter were $63.7 million, or 24 cents per share, compared with $72.6 million, or 28 cents per share, in the same quarter of 2011.

Twelve analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected core FFO of 24 cents per share for the quarter. FFO is a common performance measure used by real estate investment trusts.

Duke reported a loss attributable to shareholders of nearly $36.4 million, or 14 cents per share, compared with a profit of $47.6 million, or 19 cents per share, in the year-ago period. The company attributed much of the loss to a $73.3 million reduction in gains on the sale of depreciable properties.

Revenue for the quarter declined to $272.4 million, down from $337.5 million in the first quarter of 2011.

Duke completed $157 million in acquisitions during the quarter and signed 1.5 million square feet of new development starts, including two industrial projects totaling 1.4 million square feet.

The company said the overall occupancy rate in its real estate portfolio rose to 92.1 percent from 90.7 percent the previous quarter.




 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT