IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Hardball tactics put City Market tenants in a bind

 IBJ Staff
November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Mayor Greg Ballard can’t have it both ways with City Market. On one hand, Ballard wants to withdraw utility subsidies for the restaurants, food stands and other tenants as part of his overarching policy of eliminating city assistance.

On the other hand, he wants tenants, many of whom complain they’re losing money, to continue operating while the city decides on a new vision for the historic downtown landmark.

The city either should continue the subsidies, in effect keeping the building open, or continue cutting subsidies and let the tenants leave peacefully while the city dreams up the vision.

As it is, the city is playing hardball with tenants it claims are behind on rent by hauling them into court or threatening to do so. The city counters that a contract is a contract: Pay up or get out.

Problem is, if the tenants are forced out, there’s little reason to keep the doors open.

City Market bustled with restaurants and food stands for a number of years after its 1970s revitalization added momentum to the renewal of downtown. Now, though, the very success of the downtown has siphoned away customers to other restaurants and shops.

City Market’s board has suggested closing the building for three years to buy time for another renovation and to rethink its mission.

Ballard instead wants to keep the market open while collecting ideas from the public and soliciting proposals for alternative uses for the mostly vacant east and west wings.

It’s understandable why Ballard would want to save money while keeping a key building open. But doing both doesn’t seem feasible.

The market should close—temporarily—or the city should acknowledge the precarious situation tenants are in and cut them some slack.

A competent public servant

As Indiana secretary of state, Todd Rokita doesn’t let much grass grow under his feet and perhaps he will have more to offer after his second term ends next year.

Rokita, 39, is drawing criticism for prosecuting Stifel Nicolaus and Co., the St. Louis financial advisory firm accused of securities fraud. Some observers think he should have chased other cases with his resources because Stifel has promised to repay investors and because the problem was triggered by the global financial meltdown.

Still, Rokita deserves praise for aggressively pursuing securities violations. And he has shown resourcefulness by increasingly funding the office with revenue from fines. If only the nation’s watchdogs, who are crucial to maintaining the trust that’s so critical for a market economy like ours, had been as vigilant.

Rokita has also offered a reasonable plan for redrawing the state’s hopelessly gerrymandered legislative districts in a way that would restore competitiveness to districts around the state.

If the young secretary of state continues offering solutions to the state’s many problems, he’ll be worthy of the mention he’s gotten recently about being a candidate to replace Mitch Daniels when the Republican governor finishes his second and final term in 2012.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?

ADVERTISEMENT