IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Indiana Fever deserves support

 IBJ Staff
October 10, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

No matter who wins the WNBA Championship (the fifth and deciding game was after IBJ’s print deadline), the Indiana Fever have demonstrated that running a professional sports franchise isn’t just a dollars-and-cents proposition. It also requires heart. And that’s what the Fever have in abundance, from ownership to management to the players on the floor.

It all starts with the commitment of Pacers Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Fever and could easily have thrown in the towel on a team that has had its ups and downs with attendance and sponsorships and has never made a profit. But ownership believes in the product and that a state with a basketball culture should have a women’s professional team.

When creating the franchise in 1999, they turned to Kelly Krauskopf, someone intimately familiar with the new league, to run it. Krauskopf had helped found the WNBA as its first director of operations. She had a brief stint away from the league before being lured to Indianapolis, where she’s been the only general manager the franchise has had.

Krauskopf told IBJ earlier this year that she believes the league and this franchise can be a vehicle for showcasing the strength and leadership of women. She also thinks the franchise can be a business success, and started the season with attendance and sponsorship revenue both headed in the right direction.

The championship has sent both numbers higher and raised the profile of a team led by WNBA defensive player of the year Tamika Catchings and south-side native Katie Douglas. Catchings, Douglas and their teammates generously support local causes and represent the franchise and the city with class.

That’s as it should be. The Fever franchise is quality from the front office to the free-throw line. It’s a team the city can celebrate.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT