IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Let's call the Super Bowl the Super Bowl

 IBJ Staff
February 6, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

So ... how ’bout that Super Bowl?

This year’s gridiron battle between the Indianapolis Colts and New Orleans Saints in Super Bowl XLIV has been the talk of the town, to be sure. Sort of.

Despite all the buzz about the Colts’ second trip in four years to the National Football League championship, it’s nearly impossible to find a public reference to the Super Bowl. That’s not because of a lack of civic pride—sports-crazy Indianapolis is in its element when it has a hometown contender.

No, it seems the NFL doesn’t want anyone to call the Super Bowl the Super Bowl.

Seriously?

Yep, the league has trademarked “Super Bowl”—along with “Super Sunday” and “NFL”—and is notorious for the lengths it will go to in order to protect its brands. Its stance: Commercial uses of the protected words by anyone other than paid sponsors lowers the value of the (multimillion-dollar) sponsorships. Businesses that dare to call the Super Bowl by name could find themselves on the receiving end of a legal smackdown. Same goes for any reference to NFL teams, which also are trademarked.

Hence, the ubiquitous references to “The Big Game” by bars, restaurants, retailers and others who stand to benefit from consumers’ interest in the Super Bowl. In fact, use of “The Big Game” as a euphemism for the Super Bowl is so widespread that the NFL filed paperwork in 2006 to trademark that phrase, too. In a rare show of restraint, it later dropped the request.

OK, let’s get this straight: The NFL has spent 44 years building a brand that has instant name recognition. Say “Super Bowl” (if you dare) and people know what you’re talking about. But instead of reveling in its ability to make the Super Bowl so much more than a football game, the league goes to extreme lengths to squeeze every penny out of it. Talk about super greedy.

For whatever reason, the Super Bowl is an event most fans don’t want to watch alone. Only two cities send teams to compete each year, but Super Bowl parties are common nationwide. Whip up a pot of chili, buy a case of beer, turn on your new widescreen TV, and you have an instant celebration. Want to avoid the mess? Head to the neighborhood hangout and cheer on your favorite team. That’s part of what makes the Super Bowl the Super Bowl instead of just another football game.

So why shouldn’t that neighborhood hangout be able to promote its Super Bowl party? Why can’t the grocery store urge customers to stop in for Super Bowl refreshments? Does letting the electronics store advertise its pre-Super Bowl sale really hurt the sponsors whose messages will be delivered on that new TV?

We understand why the NFL cracks down on unlicensed merchandise, as reporter Scott Olson wrote about in a Friday story on IBJ.com, even if we think the league sometimes takes enforcement too far. But forbidding businesses from simply using the name is ridiculous. It’s the Super Bowl, and everyone should be able to call it that.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Kroger
    I noticed that Kroger mentions that they're an official sponsor in their commercials about 2 seconds after they remind you to pick up snacks for Super Bowl XLIV. The fact that they'd sponsored seemed almost as odd as the fact that they were promoting a sale on bottled water in Indiana the day before "The Big Game". Everyone knows that Saturdays are for beer sales (especially Saturdays pre-Super Bowl XLIV).

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It scares me when legislators advocate for a change and follow it up with statement such as this:
    "I'm hoping that maybe we'll be able to collect enough that we can kind of offset the impact of this loss of revenue to the state,"

    Maybe we shouldn't be so quick to push this tax cut agenda until we at least have a system in place for online sales tax. This is akin to counting your chickens before they hatch... or rather, before you even have eggs in the basket!

  2. Well, well, well...talk about a conflict of interest. Well just another example of Republican cheating and cowardice. Dumezich needs to recuse himself, but then he and Romney are obviously afraid of any competition. Therefore, I definitely will not vote for Romney in the primary, nor will I support him. I will encourage my family and friends to also withdraw their support for Romney. I also am cancelling my contributions to the Romney campaign.

  3. Bloomie's actually just closed their MOA location.

  4. Circle Center Mall needs Bloomingdale Department Store. Bloomingdale is in the Mall of America in Bloomington, MN. Indiana needs a Bloomingdale store.

  5. All right to work really does is send a message to unions that they have to earn the right to represent a group of workers and more importantly show value for the dues collected. We all know there are good unions and poor ones, just like there are good employers an poor ones. why not agree to split political contributins by having members vote and split the donations proportionally. Rather than just demanding higher per hour wages, why not get some skin in the game and tie wages to performance. The old union business model is dead, come up with the right one and your members will support you. Continue to approach companies as us vs, them and you will loose. Our competition should be with our employer, but with our competitors in the international market.

ADVERTISEMENT